PonsV2LauncherToken $TACITA

Risks (8)

• HighOne funder's 2 wallets bundled 25.1% of supplysnipersDeterministic

  2 wallets funded by the same address 0x88d2…51d3 bought 25.1% of the supply together (block 100303396). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

  Evidence

  • on-chainbundles with commonFunder 0x88d25c861938a91af4ad57ad964a8fcc6c6351d3: 2 wallets, pctSupply 25.08

  Confirmed by: facts

• HighCreator-declared wallets bought 25.1% of supply at launchinsidersDeterministic

  4 wallet(s) linked to the team (declared by the creator at launch, exempt from the snipe tax) bought 25.1% of the supply in the first blocks — an insider allocation that real buyers did not get. They now hold 0%, so current dump pressure from them is low; most of it has already been sold.

  Evidence

  • on-chaininsiders: 4 wallets, fundedBy declared by creator at launch (snipe-tax exempt on curve; creator 0x14ff0dc2b78f4aa034d8afb27754a1293f6124ef), bought at launch 25.08%, pctSupplyHeldNow 0
  • on-chainbundle block 100303396: wallets 0x05f410290c80fec28f9dc8c80e5fbc1ab6a9d830, 0x44a9dc7ec3b3d0a41edcafa1237c6bf3060b15c1; commonFunder 0x88d25c861938a91af4ad57ad964a8fcc6c6351d3; pctSupply 25.0781
  • on-chaininsiders: declared by creator at launch (snipe-tax exempt on curve; creator 0x14ff0dc2b78f4aa034d8afb27754a1293f6124ef), pctSupplyHeldNow 0
  • on-chaindeployerSoldPct: 35.6832

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5

• HighLaunch sniped: 45 wallets took 90.6% of supply in 10 secondssnipersDeterministic

  The launch was captured: 45 wallets bought 90.6% of the supply within 10 seconds. A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=100, wallets=45, pctSupplyBought=90.6103, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks 100, pctSupplyBought 90.6103, pctSupplyHeldNow 0
  • on-chainbundle block 100303442: pctSupply 14.8927

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5

• MediumX post promises revenue share that the project's docs denyclaims-mismatchAI

  The official account said it is working on sharing part of Tacita's revenue with $TACITA holders. The website and token docs say the opposite: no revenue share, no yield, and holders get no part of income, fees, or profits. Anyone buying because of the revenue-share post is relying on a claim the project's own docs reject. There is no published contract or mechanics for that share, so it is a promise the team can drop.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115556233528680709
    Show source

    What's next for holders. On top of the daily Bonus tiers, we're working on sharing part of Tacita's revenue with $TACITA holders.

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/
    Show source

    No revenue share, no yield, no returns — holding the token gives you free daily AI credits.

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/docs/token/
    Show source

    Holders receive no part of Tacita's income, fees or profits.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

• MediumClaim that trade fees fund holder credits is contradictedclaims-mismatchAI

  The active simulated Uniswap v4 venue had fee tier 0 and measured 0% token-level buy and sell taxes, so current trades do not consistently generate the claimed fee share. A creator tax existed on the now-graduated bonding curve, but the material does not show current trade fees funding the treasury, holder credits, or buybacks.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115524483515638021
    Show source

    Where do the fees go? A share of every $TACITA trade's fee goes to the Tacita treasury. It pays for free daily credits for holders: $0.10 to $1.00 a day, on any model. Part of it will also go to buybacks.

  • forkvenue uniswap-v4 fee tier 0 — pool LP fee is included in quotes; reported taxes are token-level
    Show source

    venue uniswap-v4 fee tier 0 — pool LP fee is included in quotes; reported taxes are token-level

  • forkbuyTaxPct = 0; sellTaxPct = 0; transferTaxPct = 0
    Show source

    buyTaxPct: 0, sellTaxPct: 0, transferTaxPct: 0

  • on-chain[launchpad] Launchpad token (Pons V2 launchpad (bonding curve → Uniswap v4)); curve=0x2e58880A088ec98DA8A091Ad91A90AC1488d5a3e; factory=0x7eD598BcEf8bd9Edd8C97A195C6d13f40801EC7e; curve: graduated=true, feeBps=100, creatorTaxBps=170, snipeTaxNow=0bps over 3s
    Show source

    curve: graduated=true, feeBps=100, creatorTaxBps=170, snipeTaxNow=0bps over 3s

  Confirmed by: gpt-5.6-sol

• MediumPrepaid credits go to team treasury and cannot be withdrawnwebsiteAI

  Credits are bought by sending ETH or stablecoins to a Tacita address the team controls. Docs say the Main balance cannot currently be withdrawn, transferred, or converted back to crypto. If the operator stops the service or does not credit a transfer, that prepaid money is not recoverable on-chain by the sender.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/docs/disclaimers/
    Show source

    Your Main balance is prepaid usage: it never expires, but it can't currently be withdrawn, transferred or converted back to crypto.

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/docs/smart-contracts/
    Show source

    Tacita treasury, which receives paid top-ups

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115589136912699662
    Show source

    Send ETH, BNB, USDC, USDT or USDG to the same Tacita address. One plain transfer, no approvals, from $1. Credited to the wallet that sent it.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

• LowWebsite domain registered one day before token launchwebsiteAI

  The project domain tacita.chat was created on 2026-10-27, one day before the token was deployed, and has no Wayback Machine history. This is common for new projects and is not proof of a scam. It does mean the project has no track record.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsite.domainCreatedAt: 2026-10-27T16:31:40.145Z; deployedAt: 2026-10-28T19:06:34.000Z; waybackSnapshots: []

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5

• LowAdmin can change holder-tier token and thresholds with no timelockwebsiteAI

  TacitaConfig, not the token contract, decides which token earns free-credit tiers and the holding thresholds. The site says the admin can change the token and the thresholds at any time, with no timelock, and the gateway picks that up within about an hour. That does not move holders' tokens, but it can shrink or redirect the advertised daily bonus for everyone.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/docs/smart-contracts/
    Show source

    change the token and the thresholds at any time. There's no timelock. A change applies on-chain immediately, and the gateway picks it up within about an hour.

  • webhttps://tacita.chat/
    Show source

    Thresholds are a starting point and may be tuned after launch.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

Positive signals (4)

• PositiveTemplate token with fixed supply and no admin powersownershipAI

  The token is OpenZeppelin ERC20 plus ERC20Burnable. The full supply is minted once in the constructor to the bonding curve. There is no owner, no mint function, no fee logic, no blacklist and no pause. The 'deployer' field is an immutable label and grants no rights. Nobody can change taxes, freeze holders or create new tokens through this contract.

  Evidence

  • codePonsV2LauncherToken.sol:L59-L70
    Show source

    deployer = deployer_;
            // Passed explicitly rather than read from msg.sender: PonsV2LaunchFactory
            // deploys this token indirectly through PonsV2LaunchDeployer to keep its
            // own bytecode under EIP-170's size limit, so msg.sender at construction
            // time would otherwise resolve to that deployer helper, not the factory.
            launchFactory = launchFactory_;
            curve = curve_;
            logo = logo_;
            description = description_;
            _socials = socials_;
    
            _mint(curve_, supply_);

  • codeERC20.sol:L176-L204
    Show source

    function _update(address from, address to, uint256 value) internal virtual {
            if (from == address(0)) {
                // Overflow check required: The rest of the code assumes that totalSupply never overflows
                _totalSupply += value;
            } else {
                uint256 fromBalance = _balances[from];
                if (fromBalance < value) {
                    revert ERC20InsufficientBalance(from, fromBalance, value);
                }
                unchecked {
                    // Overflow not possible: value <= fromBalance <= totalSupply.
                    _balances[from] = fromBalance - value;
                }
            }

  • on-chainprivileges: [] ; isProxy: false
  • staticslither 0.11.6: issues []

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5

• PositiveSimulation: buy, sell and transfer work with 0% token taxhoneypotAI

  A fork simulation bought and sold on the Uniswap v4 pool and received the expected amounts. A second wallet that received tokens by transfer could also sell, and selling after one hour worked. Token-level buy, sell and transfer taxes are 0%.

  Evidence

  • forkcanBuy=true, canSell=true, buyTaxPct=0, sellTaxPct=0, transferTaxPct=0
  • forksecond wallet (received via transfer) could sell

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5

• PositiveMain pool liquidity is locked, but only about $4.5k deepliquidityAI

  The main Uniswap v4 pool reports 100% of LP locked and 0% held by the deployer, so the deployer cannot pull this liquidity. The pool holds only about $4.5k of liquidity, so large sells will move the price sharply. The other pools are negligible, and one of them has unlocked positions holding about $4.

  Evidence

  • on-chainpool 0xd5247a95ef907d42004e552461753f08020a4c164f51491635a468e92cd92382: liquidityUsd 4537, lpLockedPct 100, lpHeldByDeployerPct 0
  • on-chaincurve: graduated=true, feeBps=100, creatorTaxBps=170

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5

• PositiveTeam tag verified on the FOMO appsocialAI

  The project posted that the FOMO app team verified Tacita's team tag. On FOMO, a verified developer profile makes the team identifiable inside that app. Nothing in the given facts shows that profile dumping, and the post does not name a person, so this is a transparency signal, not a full public doxx.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115535819159011632
    Show source

    we’ve got our team tag on Fomo. thanks to the @fomo team for verifying Tacita.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

Notes (2)

• LowMain pool uses an unreviewed Uniswap v4 hookliquidityAI

  The main pool uses hook contract 0xE5e7…e044, whose source was not provided. It is likely the Pons launchpad hook, but this is unverified. Today the simulation shows no sell block and no token tax through this pool. Whether the hook can be changed or can apply fees later cannot be checked from the material provided.

  Evidence

  • on-chainuniswap-v4 0xd5247a95ef…: hooks=0xE5e702641Ea86F4ae6cC3cDaeD2B886f976Be044

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5

• InfoClaimed buyback-burn and dev token lock cannot be verifiedclaims-mismatchAI

  The account says a 0.5% supply buyback-and-burn is done and that dev supply is locked, each with a short link. The on-chain facts provided list an empty deployer history and do not show a burn transaction or a locker balance. Those two claims are unverifiable from this material, not disproven.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115532581689029056
    Show source

    our first buyback + burn is complete. 0.5% of the total supply burned.

  • Xhttps://x.com/tacitachat/status/2115521809760350701
    Show source

    Dev supply is locked. LOCK:

  • on-chaindeployerHistory=[]
    Show source

    deployerHistory: []

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7