Skip to content
BYTEJURY
@bytejury

No contract found — this is a project check (site + X). Paste the contract address on the Scan page for a full audit.

X project·Scanned 04 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC·check #2

zora.co

zora.co ↗

Verdict

Unknown

78/100 site + X

Website-only check: no coin contract found, so no owner powers, taxes or holders assessed; site online since 2018.

Re-scan #2 · score 78 → 78±0

This was a check of the zora.co website only. No specific coin or contract address was found, so owner powers, fees, sellability and holders were not checked. Each coin made on Zora is its own contract and needs a separate check. The website has a long history, with archived copies back to 2018, and no scam warnings about it were found.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    n/a
  • Token
    n/a
  • Social / X
    n/a
  • Website
    78

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

What would change the verdict

  • Raises safety:A specific Zora coin contract address is supplied and its buy and sell simulation passes with low tax → token can be assessed, verdict up
Open zora.co ↗

Have the contract address? Scan the contract for a full on-chain audit.

Findings

1 findings

Risks (1)

  • InfoProject check: no contract address foundotherDeterministic

    PROJECT CHECK: no contract address was found on X (thread, profile, posts) or on the website, so only the website and the X account were checked. Contract and token are NOT assessed. Reply with the token address for a full on-chain check.

    Evidence

    • webX thread, profile, pinned tweet, recent posts and website searched for a contract address

    Confirmed by: facts

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    —
    Not assessed

    Not enough data — excluded from the overall score.

  • Token

    weight 30%
    —
    Not assessed

    Not enough data — excluded from the overall score.

  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    —
    Not assessed

    Not enough data — excluded from the overall score.

  • Website

    weight 10%
    78

    The domain is long-established with regular archive history, but the fetched page held little content and few claims to verify.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Archived snapshots since August 2018
    • Regular captures through 2025
    • No scam or rug warnings found in X search

    Lowered the score

    • Very little page text captured
    • No team, docs or token details on the landing page