Volition $VOLITION

Risks (8)

• HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

  The deployer wallet has sold 100% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

  Evidence

  • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100

  Confirmed by: facts

• HighLaunch sniped: 63 wallets took 115.7% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

  The launch was captured: 63 wallets bought 115.7% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=63, pctSupplyBought=115.7302, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
  • on-chainbundles: block 465386077 wallets AqSJjxWhobSUVcTjuJKKVVBAvBP8Pd3TnTXpoUS7nntu, GKxqKe7Ch9P7UAVn7oM9tf1UtSQhbzEsqbmqXniJag2e, 2sDKf1fdjQM7ydiqX9ggwci3YpAZvwuvjzrNXScYxvdx pctSupply 56.7702
  • on-chainLaunch slot 465386077; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 72 buys by 63 wallets in window — early history truncated at 1000 txs (slot 465386109), figures are a lower bound
  • on-chainDeployer bought/received 10.3218% of supply at launch (slot 465386077–465386078)
  • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100; Deployer Cy5iUsnUork26ZXQoQc4WZySgwgKRdqKseE7UGHAqeHm holds 0% now
  • on-chainsnipers.pctSupplyHeldNow = 0

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7

• HighTeam says fees are locked, then says it will pool and reallocate themclaims-mismatchAI

  Buyers were told each coin's creator fees are locked on pump.fun (70% to that coin's agent) and that nobody, including the platform, can withdraw a lamport. About 27 minutes later the same account said routing to agent wallets failed, so fees will be collected and handed out in batches based on each agent's performance. That means the operators, not the locked split, decide which wallets get the SOL. Holders cannot treat the 'dev can leave, coin keeps working' promise as binding.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Volitionxyz/status/2118040901561848253
    Show source

    Due to technical challenges with routing fees directly to individual AI agent wallets, fees will instead be collected and distributed in batches. Allocations will be determined by each agent’s performance metrics and trading activity

  • Xhttps://x.com/Volitionxyz/status/2118041014082716045
    Show source

    3.89 SOL of creator fees already paid to those agents, and not one lamport of it can be withdrawn. They only buy, burn and airdrop

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    The shares are locked by pump.fun at launch (the fee sharing admin is revoked on the same update), so neither the launcher, the agent nor the platform can change them afterwards.

  • Xhttps://x.com/Volitionxyz/status/2117695220628263140
    Show source

    Its fee split is locked on-chain at launch: 70% to the agent, 20% to burning $VOLITION, 10% to the treasury. Nobody can change it. Not the dev, not us, not the agent itself

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• MediumOne funder's 18 wallets bundled 6.24% of supplysnipersDeterministic

  18 wallets funded by the same address w97m2n12ndsgwu3bppycphdxnwz15sduznod5jnfaqh bought 6.24% of the supply together (blocks 465386094, 465386096). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

  Evidence

  • on-chainbundles with commonFunder w97m2n12ndsgwu3bppycphdxnwz15sduznod5jnfaqh: 18 wallets, pctSupply 6.24

  Confirmed by: facts

• MediumAgent funds are controlled by the platform's signer, not an on-chain lockwebsiteAI

  The docs say each agent's key is stored by Volition and that spend rules (no transfer out, position caps) are enforced only by that signer, not by a program that holds the funds. The status page shows a platform kill switch and a case where the signer already refused a swap. If the signer is changed or bypassed, the people running it can move agent SOL even though the site says withdrawals are impossible. Trading losses are also admitted.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    Honest limits: the 70/20/10 split is enforced by pump.fun, while the agent's spending rules are enforced by our signer, not by an on-chain program holding its funds.

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    The agent's key is held by the platform's isolated signer, sealed with AES-256-GCM.

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/status
    Show source

    $15151: signer refused: the swap touches another of the agent's accounts

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/status
    Show source

    Kill switch
    off

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowUnidentified program vault holds 10.27% of supplyholdersAI

  The second-largest holder is a program-owned address, labeled only as a PDA, holding 10.27% of supply. Its owner and purpose are not identified in the facts, so it is unclear who can release these tokens. One funder-linked cluster also holds 3.68%. Excluding the pool, the top 10 holders own 30.28%.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintopHolders: 3MFoSmQEPshfM2NRk27KGb7SRi5ki543HUHqQiK7SGhb 10.2705% label "PDA of SPL Token-2022"
  • on-chaincluster funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe wallets 3xcAbNJhjq7uWH24bcxnsu5uZHhM3mH177XzLEhoH8Mr, H84FjCv9TGAJ3wV9xkK5SLFR8xv7VSoYBp3zVwqABwhX pctSupplyHeldNow 3.6769
  • on-chaintop10Pct = 30.2759

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowPosts and docs give conflicting fee-split figuresclaims-mismatchAI

  The go-live post said fees are used 40% buyback-and-burn, 30% airdrops, and 30% AI trading. The docs and an earlier post say pump.fun locks 70% to the agent, 20% to burning $VOLITION, and 10% to a treasury, and that half of what the agent receives is burned (or 40/30/30 of agent receipts only if the coin is paired). A buyer cannot tell from the posts alone what share of fees actually burns their coin versus going to the treasury or other trades.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Volitionxyz/status/2118026179718328822
    Show source

    Here's how fees are used: 40% - Buyback and burn your token. 30% - Buy paired assets and airdrop them to holders every 6 hours. 30% - Autonomous AI trading.

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    The coin's agent
    70%
    $VOLITION buyback and burn
    20%
    Treasury
    10%

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    50% of everything the agent receives buys back its own coin

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/how-it-works
    Show source

    A paired coin's agent spends what it receives 40% on buying back and burning the coin, 30% on the paired assets and 30% on trading.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

• Lowpump.fun programs are upgradeable by a multisig and unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

  The launchpad and the AMM that hold the liquidity can have their code replaced by a Squads v4 multisig. Neither build is verified with OtterSec. The PumpSwap admin can disable buy and sell globally and can change pool fees. These are platform-level powers held by pump.fun, not by the token creator, and they apply to every pump.fun token.

  Evidence

  • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
  • on-chainPROGRAM pool pAMMBay6oceH9fJKBRHGP5D4bD4sWpmSwMn52FMfXEA (PumpSwap AMM) loader=bpf-upgradeable upgradeable=true verifiedBuild=false
  • on-chainix disable(disable_create_pool: bool, disable_deposit: bool, disable_withdraw: bool, disable_buy: bool, disable_sell: bool) signers=[admin]
  • on-chainix update_fee_config(lp_fee_basis_points: u64, protocol_fee_basis_points: u64, protocol_fee_recipients: [pubkey;8], coin_creator_fee_basis_points: u64, admin_set_coin_creator_authority: pubkey) signers=[admin]

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (5)

• PositiveMint and freeze authority revoked: supply fixed, no freezingmintAI

  Nobody can create new VOLITION tokens, and nobody can freeze a holder's token account to block selling. The supply of 968,817,167.95 tokens is final.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
  • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
  • on-chainsupply = 968817167951810 (968,817,167.95181)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveMetadata is immutable and there are no risky token extensionsotherAI

  The token uses the standard Token-2022 program. Its only extensions are metadataPointer and tokenMetadata, and both have no authority. It has no permanent delegate, transfer hook, transfer fee, default-frozen accounts or pause. The name, symbol and links cannot be changed later.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at JDaram8Jt8qVVKuWTBN9dYk69xmpKFHj6RrzVGgXpump; pointer authority none
  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "Volition" (VOLITION); update authority none (immutable)
  • on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositivePumpSwap pool LP is 100% burned, but the pool is only ~$9k deepliquidityAI

  The bonding curve completed and liquidity moved to the canonical pump.fun migration pool on PumpSwap. All LP tokens were burned, so neither the creator nor anyone else can withdraw this liquidity. The pool is shallow, at about $9,042, so large sells will move the price a lot.

  Evidence

  • on-chainPumpSwap Gb6vwA2aWwCZgkGenYboDUQ8aeia9CFcTpLfLd69AsJK: LP minted 4193388286081, LP mint supply now 0 → 100% burned
  • on-chainPumpSwap pool Gb6vwA2aWwCZgkGenYboDUQ8aeia9CFcTpLfLd69AsJK is the canonical pump.fun migration pool (created by pump.fun pool-authority PDA)
  • on-chainPOOL PumpSwap Gb6vwA2aWwCZgkGenYboDUQ8aeia9CFcTpLfLd69AsJK quote=SOL liquidityUsd=9042 lpBurnedPct=100 lpLockedPct=0

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveSelling works in simulation with 0% buy and sell taxhoneypotAI

  A Jupiter round-trip buy and sell of 0.1 SOL lost 2.81%. That loss comes from price impact and the normal pool and protocol fees. A simulated sell by an existing holder succeeded. Buy tax and sell tax measured 0%.

  Evidence

  • forksell quote: 592377827875 tokens → 0.097187796 SOL; round-trip loss 2.81% (price impact 2.83%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
  • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 592377827875 raw tokens by existing holder HWtUXQUz14wytUW8BkkSdCTymgBpgNat4rrtnLqrCfAA succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveNew X account has posted only about this projectsocialAI

  @Volitionxyz was created the same day the site domain was registered (29 Oct 2026), is verified, follows 2 accounts, and its visible posts are all about Volition rather than an unrelated older brand. That does not prove who runs it, and no named team is shown, but it is not a dormant account that was renamed for this launch.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Volitionxyz/status/2115922368623215100
    Show source

    Something is coming

  • webhttps://volitiontrading.xyz/
    Show source

    Follow @Volitionxyz on X

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

Notes (3)

• InfoWebsite domain registered six days before launchwebsiteAI

  The project site's domain was created on 2026-10-29, and the token launched on 2026-11-04. The site has no archive history. This is common for new memecoins and is context only.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsite.domainCreatedAt = 2026-10-29T15:21:14.000Z; waybackSnapshots = []

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoCreator wallet has no earlier token launchesdeployer-historyAI

  The creator's full history of 25 transactions shows only this one mint, so there is no record of past rugs from this wallet. It is also effectively a fresh wallet.

  Evidence

  • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 25 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoScanner bot's cabal and dump figures are unverified allegationssocialAI

  LarpCheck, an automated scanner, replied that launch buyers dumped, a cabal holds 6.4%, and price is 82% off the peak, and that AI trading and $VOLITION's own agent were unconfirmed. Our facts only show 439 holders, top 10 at about 30.3%, mint/freeze treated as renounced, and an empty deployer-rug history. Those bot percentages are unverified here and should not be treated as proven.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Larpcheckbot/status/2118043670402187740
    Show source

    Real fee-burn mechanism, but launch buyers dumped: cabal holds 6.4%, price 82% off peak.

  • on-chainholdersCount=439; top10Pct=30.2759; ownerRenounced=true; deployerHistory=[]
    Show source

    holdersCount 439, top10Pct 30.2759, ownerRenounced true, deployerHistory empty

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol