Solana·Scanned 06 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC
ORPO
Verdict
69/100 safety
Mint, freeze and metadata authorities revoked; sells work at 0% tax. Creator already sold ~94% of its launch buy.
The token itself is clean: no one can mint, freeze or rename it, and selling works with no token tax. The main risks are distribution and trust. The creator has already sold about 94% of its launch tokens, the launch was partly sniped in bundles, and linked or fresh wallets still hold a meaningful share. The project is only days old, its fee sharing, buyback and token lock claims are unverified, and one unconfirmed reply alleges an earlier rug.
Score breakdown
- Contract88
- Token55
- Social / X50
- Website50
Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best
- Yes
- 0%
- Renounced
- 0% / 0%
NarrativeCooling
Trend scout · Grok 4.7 · X search via twitterapi.io
28/100 heat
A separate score, not part of the safety score: hype never makes a contract safer.
- AI trading agents
- perpetual futures
- prediction markets
- Fit
- Core: the product is this narrative
- Buzz
- Organic49 posts from 36 accounts; 6% of authors have accounts under 30 days old; 11 post(s) with engagement that does not fit the follower count.
- Momentum
- Rough project-keyword volume rose about 6.7× (~4329 vs 646), but much of the sample is Finnish political Orpo talk; crypto posts are a small same-day cluster while AI-agent talk is roughly flat.
ORPO’s account says it is a Solana AI agent for token trades, perpetual futures and prediction markets, including Telegram. Its own posts are recent and lightly liked. Most sampled “Orpo” posts are about Finnish politics, not the token, so project-specific discussion remains thin.
Posts and accounts (4 posts)
- @Orpofun · 06 Nov 2026, 05:45 UTC
“ORPO brings AI-powered trading to Solana Chain, combining token trading, perpetual futures, and prediction markets”
- @0xTrunkd · 06 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC
“perps, tokens and prediction markets all in one place. the 5 min up/down markets are a nice touch too.”
Who pushes it
- @Orpofun · 60 followers
- @0xTrunkd · 3.1K followers
- @yungpabll0 · 891 followers
Competing for the same narrative
Hyperliquid, Lighter, Variational
Posts, last 7 days vs the 7 before
- project: ~4329 vs 646 (up 6.7× (rough))
- AI trading agents: ~4019 vs 3354 (flat (rough))
- perpetual futures: ~1418 (no comparison)
~ = estimated from one page of results
Measured in code from 49 posts by 36 accounts: 6% fresh accounts (< 30 days), 0% near-copies, top 3 accounts wrote 20%.
X posts searched from 2026-10-07 to 2026-11-07 (UTC). Post links come only from the X search results.
- MC at check
- $8.2K
- MC now
- no live price
- Since check
- —
- Liquidity
- —
Live chart
The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.
Key findings
- HighDeployer sold 93.9% of their tokens
- Medium7.4% of supply sniped in bundles at launch; snipers have now exited
- LowLinked wallet clusters and fresh wallets among top holders
- LowSite asks for USDC deposits to an ORPO account; custody unproven
- GoodMint and freeze authority both revoked
What would change the verdict
- Raises safety:Streamflow lock of 37.5M ORPO is confirmed on-chain with a long unlock date → up
Unlock PRO for this project
A one-time payment adds hourly re-checks for good, a 7-day watch, questions to the jury, the launch map and deeper social forensics.
Findings
14 findingsRisks (4)
HighDeployer sold 93.9% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic
The deployer wallet has sold 93.9% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.
Evidence
- on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 93.8787
- on-chainDeployer bought/received 3.4199% of supply at launch (slot 466201604–466201605)
- on-chainDeployer 2gc8kV2dHeXoWLgZAXqPSXEomPmqrVQhKXu87Hhu5RvQ holds 0.2307% now
Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5
Medium7.4% of supply sniped in bundles at launch; snipers have now exitedsnipersAI
In the first 25 slots (about 10 seconds), 8 wallets bought 7.3646% of supply, partly in same-slot bundles. Those sniper wallets hold 0% now. One bundle wallet (AnHnjfGJZ9Gt25QEDhx1yedN3hQaw52H52wTWMg9oZTp) shares a funder with two current top holders.
Evidence
- on-chainLaunch slot 466201604; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 8 buys by 8 wallets in window
- on-chainsnipers.pctSupplyBought = 7.3646, pctSupplyHeldNow = 0
- on-chainbundle block 466201606 wallets 4pCS6NJqdQEWnRf1v1HDDWPzVuGzkaf3KcCvVmYfLYrq, AnHnjfGJZ9Gt25QEDhx1yedN3hQaw52H52wTWMg9oZTp pctSupply 3.4868
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
LowLinked wallet clusters and fresh wallets among top holdersholdersAI
Two groups of top holders were each funded by a common wallet. Together the two groups hold about 7.7% of supply. Fresh wallets hold 16.28% of supply. The holder base is small (47 holders). A common funder is a signal, not proof, of one entity controlling several wallets.
Evidence
- on-chaincluster funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe wallets Hyjh3pW4WvYbzNoDxzyF21Y92NNTYZ2GhMFEySajB3rH, 3jd8kwnov9L9sh1trewDXLQNmJBoNYAbTvWNDyZE8knL pctSupplyHeldNow 3.9915
- on-chaincluster funder 8DfHuYFv7VQ6wgcGtVDN2vtFn5ezF52hHNtPWYcqm8hU wallets 9hm2PS5bFyMTtKJQNzo4gUyNKD5epwP483CPXHuiNHWj, A2YfDuVbtEwmt1X2xNrYVpiDMm3MgDc5rp8aofbgdAXY, AnHnjfGJZ9Gt25QEDhx1yedN3hQaw52H52wTWMg9oZTp pctSupplyHeldNow 3.6901
- on-chainfreshWalletsPct = 16.2783
- on-chainholdersCount = 47
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
LowSite asks for USDC deposits to an ORPO account; custody unprovenclaims-mismatchAI
The homepage tells users to send USDC into an ORPO account, while also saying the wallet stays the owner, the agent cannot move funds elsewhere, and every withdrawal needs a fresh wallet signature. Those statements conflict. Anyone who deposits has to trust ORPO's off-site account and agent, not just the pump.fun token. There is no public proof here of how that account is custodied.
Evidence
Show source
Sign in with your Solana wallet and send USDC to your ORPO account.Show source
Your wallet stays the ownerShow source
ORPO opens and closes positions and moves money between your pockets. It can't send your money anywhere else.Show source
Every withdrawal needs a fresh signature from your wallet. The agent can't make one, and you can switch it off at any time.
Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
Positive signals (5)
PositiveMint and freeze authority both revokedmintAI
No one can create new ORPO tokens, so the supply is fixed at 1,000,000,000. No one can freeze a holder's token account to stop them selling.
Evidence
- on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
- on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveImmutable metadata and no risky Token-2022 extensionsotherAI
The only Token-2022 extensions are metadataPointer and tokenMetadata, and neither has an authority. Name, symbol and links cannot be changed later. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee and no default-frozen account state.
Evidence
- on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "ORPO" (ORPO); update authority none (immutable)
- on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at Ho7n9cAt7Yjfxk7DnkZ5VDNUQrPP76FqySaSaTZWpump; pointer authority none
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveSelling works with no token taxhoneypotAI
A Jupiter quote through the pump.fun curve allowed both a buy and a sell. The round trip lost 2.82%, which comes from price impact and the normal curve fees; no token tax was charged. A real holder's sell also succeeded in a read-only simulation.
Evidence
- forksell quote: 1083612903085 tokens → 0.097176158 SOL; round-trip loss 2.82% (price impact 2.83%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
- forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 1083612903085 raw tokens by existing holder 86KFS6eAoq896AGzpzdpmnREFHE5btrou6vkiHxbBpm8 succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveLiquidity sits in the pump.fun bonding curve, not with the creatorliquidityAI
The token has not graduated; the curve is about 60% complete. The SOL and tokens in the curve are controlled by the pump.fun program, and the creator cannot withdraw them. No LP tokens exist yet. After graduation, liquidity moves to an AMM pool whose LP handling cannot be checked yet.
Evidence
- on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve 4Mm3yprGyRaB5AjyBTHvWa1PuSKjFMXXFgCGMMyJffEa: liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation
- on-chain[launchpad] pump.fun curve 4Mm3yprGyRaB5AjyBTHvWa1PuSKjFMXXFgCGMMyJffEa: complete=false, progress ≈ 60.29% , real SOL 24.116530045, real tokens 314927499068225, creator 2gc8kV2dHeXoWLgZAXqPSXEomPmqrVQhKXu87Hhu5RvQ
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveTeam claims 37.5M ORPO locked on Streamflow (not confirmed)socialAI
On launch day the project posted that 37,512,216 ORPO are locked with Streamflow and that amount, time, and recipients are public on-chain. Streamflow is a Solana vesting and token-lock product. The short link in that post was not fetched, so the lock itself is not confirmed here. It is a transparency claim, not a risk.
Evidence
Show source
Don't trust. Verify. 37,512,216 $ORPO are now locked with @Streamflow_Fi Amount, time period and recipients are all public on-chain.Show source
Solana token distribution - automated vesting, airdrops, staking and on-chain payroll.
Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
Notes (5)
Lowpump.fun program is upgradeable by a multisig; build unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI
The bonding-curve program that holds all current liquidity can be replaced by a Squads v4 multisig. Its on-chain build is not verified by OtterSec. The pump.fun admin also controls fee parameters (set_params, update_buyback_config) and can change a coin's creator (admin_cto, set_creator). This is a platform-wide trust assumption shared by every pump.fun token, not a power of the ORPO creator.
Evidence
- on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
- on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified
- on-chainix set_params(initial_virtual_token_reserves: u64, initial_virtual_sol_reserves: u64, initial_real_token_reserves: u64, token_total_supply: u64, fee_basis_points: u64, withdraw_authority: pubkey, enable_migrate: bool, pool_migration_fee: u64, creator_fee_basis_points: u64, set_creator_authority: pubkey, admin_set_creator_authority: pubkey) signers=[authority] risk=high
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
InfoTrading-agent app test timed out; features unconfirmedwebsiteAI
The site, orpo.fun, presents an AI trading-agent app. The domain was created on 2026-10-25. In testing, the app only asked for an off-chain sign-in message, which moves no funds. The test then timed out, so the trading functionality could not be confirmed.
Evidence
Show source
ORPO · Tell your agent what to trade- on-chainsite.domainCreatedAt = 2026-10-25T08:23:54.826Z
- forkdappTests Markets: wallet no balance change; 0 tx (none). No successful transaction was made for this goal (timeout).
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
InfoCreator wallet has no earlier token launchesdeployer-historyAI
The creator's full history (9 transactions) shows only this one token created. There is no prior rug record, but also no track record.
Evidence
- on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 9 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
InfoX account and site are two weeks old with a tiny audiencesocialAI
@Orpofun was created on 2026-10-26 and orpo.fun on 2026-10-25, about eleven days before the 2026-11-06 pump.fun launch. The account has 60 followers and 0 following. Posts are only about ORPO (no sign of a renamed older account in the material). Replies are mostly generic 'let's connect' and one '100x' call. That fits a new small project, not proven fake volume.
Evidence
Show source
ORPO is officially LIVE on Solana. $ORPO CA: Ho7n9cAt7Yjfxk7DnkZ5VDNUQrPP76FqySaSaTZWpumpShow source
@Orpofun @Orpofun $Orpo could be next 100x !Show source
$ORPO Ho7n9cAt7Yjfxk7DnkZ5VDNUQrPP76FqySaSaTZWpump
Confirmed by: grok-4.7
InfoSingle reply alleges an earlier Pons rug; unverifieddeployer-historyAI
A single reply says the team launched on Pons (a Robinhood Chain launchpad), rugged, and deleted a contract address. No earlier token, wallet, or deleted post is in the material, and the given deployer history is empty. Treat the reply as an unverified allegation, not proof of a past rug.
Evidence
Show source
@Orpofun @streamflow_fi guys dont buy that shit he launched on pons and rugged now he tryna do it on solana with a deleted ca- on-chaindeployerHistory=[]
Show source
deployer 2gc8kV2dHeXoWLgZAXqPSXEomPmqrVQhKXu87Hhu5RvQ deployerHistory empty
Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
Score breakdown
Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.
Contract
weight 45%88A standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with all authorities revoked, no risky extensions and a working 0% tax sell; the only residual trust is the upgradeable pump.fun platform.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Mint and freeze authority revoked
- Immutable metadata, no risky Token-2022 extensions
- Buy and sell simulation pass with 0% tax
- Liquidity held by the curve program, not the creator
Lowered the score
- pump.fun program is upgradeable by a multisig and its build is unverified
Token
weight 30%55Launch sniping and bundling were moderate (about 7.4%) and those wallets have exited, but the creator dumped most of its buy and linked clusters and fresh wallets remain among the holders.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Snipers hold 0% now
- Top-10 holders own about 25% outside the curve
- Liquidity cannot be withdrawn by the creator
- No prior launches by the creator wallet
Lowered the score
- Creator sold about 94% of its tokens
- Bundled snipe of about 7.4% at launch
- Two linked wallet clusters hold about 7.7%
- Fresh wallets hold 16%; only 47 holders
Social / X
weight 15%50The X account is two weeks old with a tiny audience; it posts consistently about the product, but one reply alleges an earlier rug that cannot be verified.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Posts consistently focus on this product
- Claims a public Streamflow token lock
Lowered the score
- Account is about two weeks old with 60 followers
- Unverified allegation of a prior rug on Pons
- Streamflow lock not confirmed
Website
weight 10%50The site is new and describes an AI trading app whose features, fee sharing and buyback claims could not be verified, and the app test timed out.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Sign-in only requested an off-chain message that moves no funds
- Site links the correct token address
Lowered the score
- Domain registered about 12 days before launch
- Fee sharing, referral and buyback claims unverifiable
- App trading test timed out
- Users must deposit USDC into an off-chain ORPO account