Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC

PlayTCG $PTCG

FVn8r1xoEMzYCDSyykTpReWi9UbrfqGmBZrQfMBmpump

Verdict

Caution

65/100 safety

Mint, freeze and metadata authorities revoked; sells work at 0% tax, but ~34% of supply was sniped at launch.

The token itself is clean: no one can mint new tokens, freeze accounts or change its details, and selling works with no tax. The main risk is the launch: about a third of the supply was grabbed by fast sniper and bundled wallets in the first seconds, and the creator wallet has moved out almost all of its tokens. The team's buyback, token lock and real-card product promises are not yet provable from on-chain or site evidence.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    88
  • Token
    42
  • Social / X
    55
  • Website
    45

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
Renounced
0% / 0%
MC at check
$21.3K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
—

$PTCG · Live price chart

Live chart

The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.

LIVE
DexScreener · pumpfun · pair FDsUie…QMBj

Key findings

  • HighDeployer sold 99.6% of their tokens
  • MediumLaunch sniped: 23 wallets took 33.8% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)
  • MediumSame-slot bundles bought up to 14.4% of supply at launch
  • Lowpump.fun program is upgradeable by its multisig, build unverified
  • GoodMint authority revoked, so supply can never grow

What would change the verdict

  • Raises safety:The Token-2022 account holding 3.35% (equal to the creator's launch buy) is shown to be a lock ending 31 Jan 2027
  • Raises safety:Weekly buyback-and-burn transactions are posted and confirmed on-chain, shrinking supply
  • Lowers safety:Sniper and bundle wallets sell their remaining ~6.7% and ~5.4% clustered holdings into the curve
  • Lowers safety:Curve graduates and the resulting pool liquidity is not program-held or burned
Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

15 findings

Risks (6)

  • HighDeployer sold 99.6% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

    The deployer wallet has sold 99.6% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 99.5964

    Confirmed by: facts

  • MediumLaunch sniped: 23 wallets took 33.8% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

    The launch was captured: 23 wallets bought 33.8% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 6.69% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is moderate — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

    Evidence

    • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=23, pctSupplyBought=33.791, pctSupplyHeldNow=6.692
    • on-chainsnipers: pctSupplyBought 33.791, pctSupplyHeldNow 6.692, windowSeconds 10
    • on-chainLaunch slot 465595882; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 24 buys by 23 wallets in window — early history truncated at 1000 txs (slot 465595945), figures are a lower bound

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • MediumSame-slot bundles bought up to 14.4% of supply at launchinsidersAI

    Many groups of wallets bought in the same slot right after launch. Same-slot buying can hide one entity spread across many wallets. The largest group was 8 wallets buying 14.4433% in slot 465595909, and two of those wallets are still top holders: HAFfm2fPfpTKjcHVmJivDPHT8Lx2yfxmVDigbG958JJV with 2.087% and DSuXByqeGhJhvmgX3dyGNdoHQNguysCcNTSwYt9EDNaH with 2.0258%. Wallets funded by one common funder, 77VFjxn7jd7sk7kFXsENkpXeiKozoz6GoPzoEiDBQoxa, hold 5.4122% together. If these are coordinated insiders, they can dump on later buyers. Shared funders can also be exchanges or bots, so this is a signal, not proof.

    Evidence

    • on-chainbundle block 465595909: 8 wallets, pctSupply 14.4433
    • on-chaincluster funder 77VFjxn7jd7sk7kFXsENkpXeiKozoz6GoPzoEiDBQoxa: Dvbv5TdAyPpJk16X9mUxWFVicYtCUxTLhuof8TGuUaRv, DSuXByqeGhJhvmgX3dyGNdoHQNguysCcNTSwYt9EDNaH, pctSupplyHeldNow 5.4122

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • Lowpump.fun program is upgradeable by its multisig, build unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

    The pump.fun launchpad program holds the curve liquidity. Its upgrade authority is a Squads v4 multisig vault, and OtterSec reports the on-chain build as not verified. The global admin can change curve parameters and fees through set_params, update_buyback_config and update_creator_fee_config. This is platform-level trust in pump.fun, not control by the PTCG creator.

    Evidence

    • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
    • on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified
    • on-chainix set_params(... fee_basis_points: u64, withdraw_authority: pubkey, ...) signers=[authority] risk=high

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowTwo-week-old website; real-card claims are off-chainwebsiteAI

    playtcg.digital was registered on 2026-10-20 and has no Wayback snapshots. The token claims holders can open packs of real graded cards they own and can ship home. Nothing in the on-chain facts proves that cards or redemption exist. That part relies entirely on trusting the team.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      PlayTCG · Real graded card packs
    • on-chaindomainCreatedAt 2026-10-20T15:13:54.075Z
    • on-chainmetadata offchain description: "PlayTCG: open packs of real graded cards on Solana. Every pull is a real slab you own: keep it, sell it back or ship it home."

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowBuyback and 3% team-lock promises are unprovenclaims-mismatchAI

    The team says 45% of creator fees buy and burn $PTCG and that a 3% team allocation is locked until 31 Jan 2027. The public tokenomics page does not publish those numbers, and we have no transaction links in the material proving a burn or a lock. Holders cannot check those promises from the site.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (5)

  • PositiveMint authority revoked, so supply can never growmintAI

    No one can create new PTCG tokens. The mint authority is null, so the supply of 990,908,622.116788 can never grow and holders cannot be diluted by new printing.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainsupply = 990908622116788 (990,908,622.116788)
    • on-chainowner=null; ownerRenounced=true; deployerHistory=[]
      Show source
      deployer 2noWeP8Q5u2cio6WYQ6xEXHzkSd8W3dZZWhbrsMstsh5

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol, grok-4.7

  • PositiveFreeze authority revoked, so holders cannot be frozenblacklistAI

    The freeze authority is null. No one can freeze a holder's token account to stop them from selling.

    Evidence

    • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveNo risky Token-2022 extensions and metadata is immutableotherAI

    The mint uses Token-2022 but has only the metadataPointer and tokenMetadata extensions. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee, no default-frozen state and no pause. The metadata update authority and pointer authority are both none, so the name, symbol and links cannot be changed later.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at FVn8r1xoEMzYCDSyykTpReWi9UbrfqGmBZrQfMBmpump; pointer authority none
    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "PlayTCG" (PTCG); update authority none (immutable)
    • on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSelling works in simulation with no buy or sell taxhoneypotAI

    A 0.1 SOL buy and full sell round-trip through Jupiter on the pump.fun curve loses 2.70%. That loss is price impact plus normal curve fees. A read-only sell simulation by an existing holder also succeeded. No buy or sell tax was detected.

    Evidence

    • forksell quote: 446319983900 tokens → 0.097302996 SOL; round-trip loss 2.70% (price impact 2.71%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
    • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 446319983900 raw tokens by existing holder HF2Lw2tYs4B3y1iqz6iw2f4wTjrn14KppvAezcm7TAT3 succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveX account and domain launched together and post the right CAsocialAI

    The official X account and the site domain were both created on 20 Oct 2026, about two weeks before the 5 Nov 2026 token launch. Posts we retrieved are about this product, the posted CA matches the mint, and the account is verified with 141 followers. That does not prove the card business is real, but it does not look like a dormant account that was bought and renamed.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      $PTCG is live. PlayTCG: open packs of real graded cards on Solana. ... CA: FVn8r1xoEMzYCDSyykTpReWi9UbrfqGmBZrQfMBmpump Any other address is not ours.
    • Show source
      Packs of real graded cards on Solana. Pokémon, One Piece and sports. Every card is real, graded and vaulted. 18+.
    • on-chaindeployedAt=2026-11-05T05:59:08.000Z; deployerHistory=[]
      Show source
      target FVn8r1xoEMzYCDSyykTpReWi9UbrfqGmBZrQfMBmpump name PlayTCG symbol PTCG

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7

Notes (4)

  • LowCreator's 3.35% may sit in a program account, lock unproveninsidersAI

    The creator wallet bought or received 3.3509% of supply at launch and now holds 0.0135%. The facts count this as 99.5964% sold, but transfers to other wallets are also counted as sold. A Token-2022 PDA holder, FXPpP6bpngoqbfHcqWJBdLFLb927YSQmXbJMSaTgWXEs, holds exactly 3.3509%. That suggests the creator's tokens may have been moved into a program-owned account rather than sold. Who controls that account, and whether it is a lock, could not be verified.

    Evidence

    • on-chainDeployer bought/received 3.3509% of supply at launch (slot 465595882–465595883)
    • on-chainDeployer 2noWeP8Q5u2cio6WYQ6xEXHzkSd8W3dZZWhbrsMstsh5 holds 0.0135% now
    • on-chaintopHolder FXPpP6bpngoqbfHcqWJBdLFLb927YSQmXbJMSaTgWXEs 3.3509% label PDA of SPL Token-2022

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoLiquidity held by the pump.fun curve; not yet graduatedliquidityAI

    The token is still on the pump.fun bonding curve, about 87.17% complete, holding about 54.35 real SOL. The curve program holds the liquidity, so the creator cannot withdraw it. LP tokens do not exist until graduation. After graduation, LP handling on the AMM must be checked again.

    Evidence

    • on-chain[launchpad] pump.fun curve FDsUied5pp7JdX3iz62St2gpAUezxd6ngf98jMhdQMBj: complete=false, progress ≈ 87.17% , real SOL 54.350118817, real tokens 101723657767163, creator 2noWeP8Q5u2cio6WYQ6xEXHzkSd8W3dZZWhbrsMstsh5
    • on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve FDsUied5pp7JdX3iz62St2gpAUezxd6ngf98jMhdQMBj: liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoCreator wallet has no earlier token launchesdeployer-historyAI

    The creator's full history of 12 transactions shows only this one mint created, so there is no prior launch record either good or bad. The creator was first funded by iGdFcQoyR2MwbXMHQskhmNsqddZ6rinsipHc4TNSdwu.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 12 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
    • on-chainDeployer was first funded by iGdFcQoyR2MwbXMHQskhmNsqddZ6rinsipHc4TNSdwu

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoCard ownership, shipping and Collector Crypt link unconfirmedwebsiteAI

    The site and account say each pack is one real graded, vaulted card you can keep, sell back, or ship, paid in USDC, and that they are powered by Collector Crypt (a separate, older verified Solana graded-card project). The app and tokenomics pages returned almost no detail, and a search of Collector Crypt posts did not return a confirmation of PlayTCG. An automated scanner also says it could not confirm slab ownership, cash-out, or shipping. That is an unverified product claim, not proof the token can trap sells.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    88

    Standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with every authority revoked, no risky extensions and a working 0% tax sell; only platform-level pump.fun upgrade trust remains.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint authority revoked, supply fixed
    • Freeze authority revoked
    • Immutable metadata, no risky Token-2022 extensions
    • Buy and sell simulation pass with 0% tax

    Lowered the score

    • pump.fun program upgradeable by Squads multisig
    • pump.fun build not verified by OtterSec
  • Token

    weight 30%
    42

    Launch was captured by snipers and same-slot bundles, and the creator wallet emptied its launch buy, though liquidity sits safely in the curve.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Curve liquidity cannot be withdrawn by the creator
    • Creator has no prior token launches
    • Top 10 wallets hold about 25%

    Lowered the score

    • 23 wallets sniped 33.8% of supply in 10 seconds
    • Same-slot bundles, largest 14.4% of supply
    • Creator wallet moved out 99.6% of its tokens
    • Linked wallets still hold about 5.4%
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    55

    A young but consistent verified X account posts the correct CA and product, yet its buyback and lock promises are unproven.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • X account and domain created together before launch
    • Posted CA matches the mint

    Lowered the score

    • Account only about two weeks old with 141 followers
    • Buyback and 3% lock claims made only on X without proof
  • Website

    weight 10%
    45

    New, thin site whose real graded-card, vault and shipping claims cannot be verified from any facts.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Site content matches the token's stated product

    Lowered the score

    • Domain registered about two weeks before launch, no archive history
    • Tokenomics page lacks buyback and lock details
    • Card custody, cash-out and Collector Crypt link unverified