Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC

Short Pad $SHORT

F7ok81gZ87Ni9LCzSeS9dvDwYYskn9g58FHmZDjkpump

Verdict

Caution

61/100 safety

Mint and freeze revoked, sells work at 0% tax, but snipers bought 67% at launch and the creator sold out.

The SHORT token itself is a clean pump.fun mint: nobody can print more tokens, freeze wallets or change its metadata, and selling works with no token tax. The main concern is how it launched. About 67% of supply was grabbed by bundled sniper wallets in the first 10 seconds and has since been sold into later buyers, and the creator also sold out their launch buy. The Short Pad website and X account are a day old, and the site describes shorts that settle on its own server against a 'house', so any SOL deposited there depends on the operator paying out.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    88
  • Token
    38
  • Social / X
    40
  • Website
    35

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
Renounced
0% / 0%
MC at check
$3.6K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
—

$SHORT · Live price chart

Live chart

The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.

LIVE
DexScreener · pumpfun · pair 4max2w…7Cjb

Key findings

  • HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokens
  • HighLaunch sniped: 29 wallets took 66.8% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)
  • MediumShorts settle on Short Pad's server; operator controls payouts
  • LowShared-funder wallet group with two snipers still holds 1.8%
  • GoodMint and freeze authority revoked: fixed supply, no freezing

What would change the verdict

  • Raises safety:Curve completes and liquidity moves to a PumpSwap pool with LP burned → token score up
  • Raises safety:Short Pad publishes on-chain shorting contracts with a verified build, so deposits no longer rely on its server → website score up
  • Lowers safety:pump.fun multisig raises curve fees or reassigns this coin's creator → contract score down
Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

12 findings

Risks (5)

  • HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

    The deployer wallet has sold 100% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100
    • on-chainDeployer bought/received 1% of supply at launch (slot 465623380–465623381)
    • on-chainDeployer Ds93wmrECG8KktfnXXDvZWD43FFx1eeErn57GpXs4BCq holds 0% now
    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = (peak balance in analysed history − balance now) / peak; transfers to other wallets count as sold (early history only)
    • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 11 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • HighLaunch sniped: 29 wallets took 66.8% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

    The launch was captured: 29 wallets bought 66.8% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

    Evidence

    • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=29, pctSupplyBought=66.7662, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
    • on-chainLaunch slot 465623380; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 32 buys by 29 wallets in window
    • on-chainsnipers.pctSupplyBought = 66.7662, snipers.pctSupplyHeldNow = 0
    • on-chainbundle block 465623380: CZAFppmT55Cz14hwxLJACvDq3JAfbWc6xMi3vvYWjhLu, haqq6qnVBCZt97amh9VUFZRFCkD6NJxoYifacCuqqqq, AqMoKz922NEWTfqHankMJBYK6iKqe6CqLasVf85hfRsW pctSupply 29.4114

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • MediumShorts settle on Short Pad's server; operator controls payoutswebsiteAI

    The site says shorts are opened against a house or a listed pool and closed at a live mark, with profit sitting in a desk balance until the site withdraws it. The operator can refuse a side and controls payouts. Anyone who deposits SOL to short can lose that margin if the desk does not pay, even though the $SHORT mint itself has no owner.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      Every market here exists so you can bet a coin goes down, and the server refuses anything else.
    • Show source
      Top memecoins are 100+ of the most traded Solana memecoins, shorted against the house at up to 5x on the deepest ones.
    • Show source
      Profit lands in your desk balance and withdraws straight to your wallet.

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowShared-funder wallet group with two snipers still holds 1.8%insidersAI

    Four wallets were funded by the same address and together hold 1.81% now. Two of them (9vpx… and 8DS2…) bought inside the sniper window, and one (877wUf…) is a top-4 holder. A common funder may also be an exchange or bot, so this is a signal, not proof of one owner.

    Evidence

    • on-chaincluster funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9: 877wUf3yALoWziGiXysDr6B8aRy6nmwx37kH2n7EPnn5, 5FvB9wkZCYKNje37iL3RsDUdJFpNS8vNXG6a3deJwGtc, 9vpxfNjNeKX2TLybQLmnFFfQ4KVXCMfRSajMt5MVxULE, 8DS2pqspcQkTBmnkSqbXHsUH3fvwwJfM1mG9brPpzMDD pctSupplyHeldNow 1.8112
    • on-chainCommon funders may be exchanges / bots funding many unrelated wallets — clusters are a signal, not proof

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowWebsite registered a day before launch; shorting claims unverifiedwebsiteAI

    The site presents a product to "Short any pump.fun coin". Its domain was registered about 15 hours before the token was created, and there are no archive snapshots. None of the facts show any on-chain shorting program tied to this token, so the product claim cannot be verified. The token itself is a plain pump.fun memecoin.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      Short Pad | Short any pump.fun coin
    • on-chainsite.domainCreatedAt = 2026-11-04T16:09:09.496Z; token createdAt=2026-11-05T07:36:55.000Z

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (4)

  • PositiveMint and freeze authority revoked: fixed supply, no freezingmintAI

    Nobody can print new SHORT tokens and nobody can freeze a holder's token account to stop them selling. Supply is fixed at about 999,993,183.79 tokens.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainsupply=999993183792271

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveMetadata is immutable with no risky Token-2022 extensionsownershipAI

    The token's name, symbol and links cannot be changed later because the update authority is null. The only Token-2022 extensions are metadataPointer and tokenMetadata, and both have no authority. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee, no default-frozen state and no pause. This is the standard pump.fun template.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "Short Pad" (SHORT); update authority none (immutable)
    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at F7ok81gZ87Ni9LCzSeS9dvDwYYskn9g58FHmZDjkpump; pointer authority none
    • on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSelling works in simulation with 0% token taxhoneypotAI

    A 0.1 SOL buy followed by a sell of the same tokens loses about 3.02%. That loss comes from price impact and the normal pump.fun fees, not from a token tax. A sell by an existing holder also succeeds in a read-only simulation.

    Evidence

    • forksell quote: 2651289352312 tokens → 0.096976888 SOL; round-trip loss 3.02% (price impact 3.05%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
    • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 2651289352312 raw tokens by existing holder 877wUf3yALoWziGiXysDr6B8aRy6nmwx37kH2n7EPnn5 succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveLiquidity is locked in the pump.fun curve, not the creator'sliquidityAI

    The token has not graduated (curve about 17.91% complete), so there is no AMM pool and no LP tokens yet. The SOL and tokens in the bonding curve are held by the pump.fun program, so the creator cannot pull the liquidity.

    Evidence

    • on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve 4max2wo9Jp89La9HS35KpeXLXxqqU3uXspW4YrdG7Cjb: liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation
    • on-chain[launchpad] pump.fun curve 4max2wo9Jp89La9HS35KpeXLXxqqU3uXspW4YrdG7Cjb: complete=false, progress ≈ 17.91% , real SOL 4.579210674, real tokens 651006176425044, creator Ds93wmrECG8KktfnXXDvZWD43FFx1eeErn57GpXs4BCq

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (3)

  • Lowpump.fun program is multisig-upgradeable and its build is unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

    The bonding-curve program that holds this token's liquidity can have its code replaced by the pump.fun Squads v4 multisig, and its on-chain build is not verified. The program's admin can also call global instructions such as set_params (fees, migration settings), admin_cto / set_creator (change the coin's creator and creator fee) and update_buyback_config. These are platform-wide powers held by pump.fun, not by this token's creator. They are the trust assumption for every pump.fun token.

    Evidence

    • on-chainPROGRAM launchpad 6EF8rrecthR5Dkzon8Nwu78hRvfCKubJ14M5uBEwF6P (pump.fun bonding curve) loader=bpf-upgradeable upgradeable=true upgradeAuthority=7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8 (multisig) verifiedBuild=false
    • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
    • on-chainix set_params(... fee_basis_points: u64, withdraw_authority: pubkey, enable_migrate: bool, ... creator_fee_basis_points: u64 ...) signers=[authority] risk=high
    • on-chainix admin_cto(is_holder_reward: Option<bool>, creator_fee_bps: Option<u64>, new_creator: Option<pubkey>) signers=[admin_set_creator_authority] risk=high

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5 · Disputed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowX replies are generic collab spam, not real communitysocialAI

    Other accounts mentioning @ShortPad_ are near-identical 'let's collaborate / follow back' pitches with no discussion of the product, audits, or losses. There are no third-party scam, rug, or honeypot warnings in the posts returned. Treat the reply pile as bots, not community endorsement.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoX account, website and token all created within one daysocialAI

    @ShortPad_ was created on 2026-11-04, the domain the same day, and $SHORT the next morning. The account has 55 followers, follows nobody, and is not verified. No names or proof of identity appear in the bio or posts, so a 'doxxed team' claim cannot be checked. A quiet new account is not itself a scam signal.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    88

    Standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with every authority revoked and working sells. The only remaining trust point is pump.fun's own multisig-upgradeable program, whose build is unverified.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint and freeze authority revoked
    • Metadata immutable, no risky Token-2022 extensions
    • Buy and sell simulation pass with 0% token tax
    • Curve liquidity cannot be withdrawn by the creator

    Lowered the score

    • pump.fun program upgradeable by a Squads multisig, build unverified
    • Platform admin can change fees and coin creator
  • Token

    weight 30%
    38

    The launch was captured: bundled snipers took about 67% of supply in 10 seconds and have fully sold, and the creator exited their buy. Current holdings, however, are spread out.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Top 10 wallets hold about 11.5% now
    • Snipers hold 0% now, so little pending dump from them
    • Deployer has no other token launches

    Lowered the score

    • 29 wallets sniped 66.8% of supply in the first 10 seconds
    • Bundled buys, including 29.4% in the creation slot
    • Deployer sold or moved 100% of their 1% buy
    • Shared-funder cluster with two snipers still holds 1.8%
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    40

    The X account is one day old, small and anonymous, and its replies are generic collab spam. No third-party warnings were found.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • No scam or rug warnings found in returned posts

    Lowered the score

    • X account created the day before launch, 55 followers
    • No identifiable team or proof of identity
    • Replies are bot-like collab spam, not real community
  • Website

    weight 10%
    35

    The site is one day old and its shorting product is entirely unverifiable. By its own description, shorts are settled against a server-side house desk that controls payouts.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Site is live with product pages

    Lowered the score

    • Domain registered about 15 hours before the token
    • All product claims (leverage, listings, liquidation) unverifiable
    • Shorts and payouts handled off-chain by the operator's server
    • No archive history