Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 16:35 UTC

Sounder $SOUNDER

DBhWAqpAJFNM1A9XY6DDb1SJVkNCv87hRdYCoCoypump

Verdict

Caution

62/100 safety

Mint, freeze and metadata authority revoked; sells work at 0% tax, but 54% of supply was sniped at launch.

The token itself is clean: nobody can mint more, freeze wallets or change its metadata, and selling works with no token tax. The main concern is how it launched: snipers and bundled wallets grabbed over half the supply in the first seconds and have since sold to later buyers. One wallet cluster still holds about 8.8%, and the main pool holds only about $5.6k, so a single seller could move the price hard. The project moved its token to Solana before building its product there, and the team is anonymous.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    88
  • Token
    30
  • Social / X
    55
  • Website
    50

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
Renounced
100% / 0%

NarrativeHot

Trend scout · Grok 4.7 · X search via twitterapi.io

36/100 heat

A separate score, not part of the safety score: hype never makes a contract safer.

  • DEX liquidity depth
  • Solana relaunch
  • tokenized stocks
Fit
Core: the product is this narrative
Buzz
Organic34 posts from 24 accounts; 4 of 34 posts are near-copies (largest group 4); 0% of authors have accounts under 30 days old; 8 post(s) with engagement that does not fit the follower count.
Momentum
Project mentions jumped from about 2 to roughly 1,650 week over week (one-page estimate, so rough); tokenized-stock talk was about flat to lower (roughly 3,900 vs 5,400).

Sounder describes itself as an on-chain tool that reads pool depth across venues. On X, talk is a one-day Solana relaunch burst: a few posts call it a liquidity meter that moved from Robinhood Chain, while others ask what happens to the old token or call the relaunch a rug. Engagement is thin.

Posts and accounts (5 posts)
  • @0xImper · 05 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC

    “$Sounder is a liquidity measurement project that did 700k on RH, they just migrated to Solana”

  • @AminTabaFuriju · 05 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC

    “Holyshito rug on rh > deploy again on Solana”

  • @ChartsHell · 05 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC

    “Until you address what happens to the previous token holders you are NOT to be trusted.”

  • @Legend_Britney · 05 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC

    “Early entries. Low-cap opportunities. No chasing pumps! $SOUNDER”

  • @ChartsHell · 05 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC

    “What happens to the old token? And to people who held it since the beginning?”

Who pushes it

Competing for the same narrative

Jupiter

Posts, last 7 days vs the 7 before

  • project: ~1654 vs 2 (up 827.0× (rough))
  • tokenized stocks: ~3856 vs 5409 (flat (rough))
  • DEX liquidity: ~1135 (no comparison)

~ = estimated from one page of results

Measured in code from 34 posts by 24 accounts: 0% fresh accounts (< 30 days), 12% near-copies, top 3 accounts wrote 26%.

X posts searched from 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-06 (UTC). Post links come only from the X search results.

MC at check
$7.0K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
$5.3K

$SOUNDER · Live price chart

Live chart

The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.

LIVE
DexScreener · pumpswap · pair 6dTUge…Xp86

Key findings

  • HighPool liquidity is neither burned nor locked
  • HighLaunch sniped: 34 wallets took 54.1% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)
  • MediumOne funder's 8 wallets bundled 10.4% of supply
  • MediumOne funder's 9 wallets bundled 14.4% of supply
  • GoodMint and freeze authority revoked; supply is fixed

What would change the verdict

  • Lowers safety:Liquid supply moves into the small Meteora DAMM v2 pool, whose LP is neither burned nor locked
  • Raises safety:The promised Solana executor ships with a verified build and an independent audit
  • Raises safety:PumpSwap pool liquidity grows well beyond ~$5.6k while holder concentration stays low

Unlock PRO for this project

A one-time payment adds hourly re-checks for good, a 7-day watch, questions to the jury, the launch map and deeper social forensics.

Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

19 findings

Risks (8)

  • HighPool liquidity is neither burned nor lockedliquidityDeterministic

    Only 0% of the Meteora DAMM v2 pool's LP is burned or locked. Whoever holds the LP tokens can withdraw the liquidity ("rug pull") at any time.

    Evidence

    • on-chainpool 7nrM8pWh6gd4Km81A8A7XFiJ1YWHHXa32iGzeu2Yw1sj (Meteora DAMM v2): lpBurnedPct=0, lpLockedPct=0

    Confirmed by: facts

  • HighLaunch sniped: 34 wallets took 54.1% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

    The launch was captured: 34 wallets bought 54.1% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

    Evidence

    • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=34, pctSupplyBought=54.1326, pctSupplyHeldNow=0.0006
    • on-chainLaunch slot 465717719; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 41 buys by 34 wallets in window
    • on-chainsnipers pctSupplyBought 54.1326, pctSupplyHeldNow 0.0006
    • on-chainbundle block 465717723 commonFunder BiBVuH4c9MA8ruSCSC5CyocVpBVrbxGdDZQVT74M9kcd pctSupply 14.3703

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7

  • MediumOne funder's 8 wallets bundled 10.4% of supplysnipersDeterministic

    8 wallets funded by the same address farvn8tkycp3lmzcq1fwlums1ucgwltfz6c4cvrdvc83 bought 10.4% of the supply together (block 465717788). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

    Evidence

    • on-chainbundles with commonFunder farvn8tkycp3lmzcq1fwlums1ucgwltfz6c4cvrdvc83: 8 wallets, pctSupply 10.4

    Confirmed by: facts

  • MediumOne funder's 9 wallets bundled 14.4% of supplysnipersDeterministic

    9 wallets funded by the same address bibvuh4c9ma8ruscsc5cyocvpbvrbxgddzqvt74m9kcd bought 14.4% of the supply together (block 465717723). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

    Evidence

    • on-chainbundles with commonFunder bibvuh4c9ma8ruscsc5cyocvpbvrbxgddzqvt74m9kcd: 9 wallets, pctSupply 14.37

    Confirmed by: facts

  • MediumSix wallets with one funder hold about 8.8% of supplyholdersAI

    Six wallets funded by F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe currently hold about 8.77% of supply. Four of them are top-10 holders, and one (7APLZA4z…) was a launch-slot sniper. If these wallets belong to one party, that party could sell this stack into a thin ~$5.5k pool. Common funding is a signal, not proof.

    Evidence

    • on-chaincluster funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe pctSupplyHeldNow 8.7739

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • MediumToken launched on Solana before the Solana product existsclaims-mismatchAI

    The account sold $SOUNDER on Solana on 5 Nov 2026 and the bio now says the tool reads depth on Solana. The same account said the working product is on Robinhood Chain and that the Solana engine still has to be rewritten, with no date. Buying the token does not buy a working Solana router. The site footer still says the product is a depth sounder for Robinhood Chain (chain 4663) and that it does not route an order you have not signed yourself.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      $SOUNDER is live on Solana. CA: DBhWAqpAJFNM1A9XY6DDb1SJVkNCv87hRdYCoCoypump Same team, same tool, now on a chain with a market. The engine follows once the rewrite is scoped.
    • Show source
      So we are moving the token to Solana, where the users and the liquidity are. The goal is the same as always: get this technology to the people who will use it. The engine will follow. Building it on Solana means rewriting it, not copying it, so we will give a date when we have one.
    • Show source
      A depth sounder for Robinhood Chain. It measures and publishes; it does not hold funds or route an order you have not signed for yourself.
    • Show source
      The executor. A Solana program that counts what arrives and refuses any fill under your floor. Then the audit, on that code. ... Order, not dates. Each one ships when it is measured.

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowDeployer's funder also funded wallets in launch bundlesinsidersAI

    The deployer was first funded by 6LY1JzAFVZsP2a2xKrtU6znQMQ5h4i7tocWdgrkZzkzF. That same wallet funded BUkpShoE… (in a bundle at block 465717789) and x3XPtihh… (in a bundle at block 465717785). This hints the dev may have bought through side wallets, although the deployer itself made no dev buy and holds 0%. That cluster holds 0% now.

    Evidence

    • on-chainDeployer was first funded by 6LY1JzAFVZsP2a2xKrtU6znQMQ5h4i7tocWdgrkZzkzF
    • on-chaincluster funder 6LY1JzAFVZsP2a2xKrtU6znQMQ5h4i7tocWdgrkZzkzF wallets BUkpShoEWRiPckdFs3kzYGjBPfUhL6G39ufo84QeogPP, x3XPtihh8zP44PFTr9E1k6Y8gtVrqFWuAxqSM7Lg27a pctSupplyHeldNow 0

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowWebsite pages contradict each other on deployed contractswebsiteAI

    The documentation still says Sounder does not execute and has no contracts deployed. The contracts page and the audit page describe SounderExecutor, SounderLens and SounderOrders as already deployed on Robinhood Chain, and posts describe a live executor there. That is a stale page, not proof the Solana token can drain wallets, but the site contradicts itself about what is actually built.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (6)

  • PositiveMint and freeze authority revoked; supply is fixedmintAI

    Nobody can create new SOUNDER tokens, and nobody can freeze a holder's token account. The supply is fixed at about 956,998,624.87 tokens, and holders cannot be locked out of selling at the token level.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainownerRenounced=true
      Show source
      owner=null, ownerRenounced=true, verified=true, symbol SOUNDER

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveMetadata immutable; no risky Token-2022 extensionsotherAI

    The token uses Token-2022, but only the metadataPointer and tokenMetadata extensions are present, and both have no authority. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee and no default-frozen state. Name, symbol and links cannot be changed.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata: "Sounder" (SOUNDER); update authority none (immutable)
    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer: pointer authority none

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveMain PumpSwap pool LP fully burned, but liquidity is thinliquidityAI

    The token completed its pump.fun bonding curve. It graduated to the canonical PumpSwap pool, and all LP tokens of that pool were burned, so no one can withdraw that liquidity. The pool's liquidity is small, about $5,571, so large sells move the price heavily.

    Evidence

    • on-chainPumpSwap 6dTUgedFaTS8qopkTLq5YeZS3TdkeSk32mw8nriWXp86: LP minted 4193388322717, LP mint supply now 0 → 100% burned
    • on-chainPumpSwap pool 6dTUgedFaTS8qopkTLq5YeZS3TdkeSk32mw8nriWXp86 liquidityUsd=5571

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSelling works with 0% token taxhoneypotAI

    A Jupiter buy/sell round trip lost 2.97%, which is explained by price impact and pool fees; buy and sell tax are 0%. A real holder's sell was simulated successfully.

    Evidence

    • forksell quote: 1202036285613 tokens → 0.09703214 SOL; round-trip loss 2.97%
    • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 1202036285613 raw tokens by existing holder CNudZYFgpbT26fidsiNrWfHeGTBMMeVWqruZXsEkcUPc succeeds

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveX account and domain existed two months before the mintsocialAI

    The X account and the domain were both created on 3 Sep 2026, about two months before the Solana mint on 5 Nov 2026. Posts from late September through October describe the Robinhood Chain scoreboard, SDK and Android build, with modest likes (about 10-21), not a burst of identical shill copy from the project account. The account is verified and follows 3 accounts.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveProject openly states its audit has not startedclaims-mismatchAI

    The audit page says the firm is still being picked, nothing is signed, and the budget is $3,500–$5,000. That matches the October post that the next step was choosing a firm. They are not claiming a finished audit.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (5)

  • Lowpump.fun multisig can upgrade programs or pause trading platform-wideproxy-upgradeAI

    The launchpad and AMM programs that hold the pool can be upgraded by pump.fun's Squads v4 multisig. The PumpSwap admin can change fees and can disable buy and sell globally. This is platform-wide trust in pump.fun, not control by the token creator. The program builds are not OtterSec-verified.

    Evidence

    • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
    • on-chainix disable(disable_create_pool: bool, disable_deposit: bool, disable_withdraw: bool, disable_buy: bool, disable_sell: bool) signers=[admin]

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowScam and rug replies on X give no evidencesocialAI

    A few replies call the project a scam or say it rugged on Robinhood. They give no transaction, old contract, or wallet. Search for the mint plus scam/rug did not return a sourced allegation. Treat those replies as noise unless someone posts proof.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoDeployer has no earlier token launches and holds nonedeployer-historyAI

    The creator's history shows only this one mint. The deployer made no dev buy and currently holds 0% of supply.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 25 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
    • on-chainDeployer 3A3ynW7VTHjpBP7KSLLbjoMex34UkCbCtxVH9rQk6cLZ holds 0% now

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoNo named person or verified identity behind the projectsocialAI

    The X account and the pages fetched do not name a founder or show identity proof. "Same team" is unverifiable. That is a trust gap, not evidence of a prior rug: the deployer history supplied for this mint is empty.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7

  • InfoPaid Dexscreener listing was disclosed by the teamsocialAI

    Right after the Solana launch the project account said it had paid Dex. That is a disclosed listing payment, not a hidden promoter. Separate accounts posted "4x" calls on the mint address; those posts do not say they were paid by the team.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    88

    Standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with every authority revoked, no risky extensions and a working sell at 0% tax; only platform-level pump.fun multisig control remains.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint and freeze authority revoked
    • Metadata immutable, no risky Token-2022 extensions
    • Buy and sell simulation pass with 0% tax
    • Real holder sell simulated successfully

    Lowered the score

    • pump.fun/PumpSwap programs upgradeable by Squads multisig, builds unverified
    • PumpSwap admin can change fees or pause trading platform-wide
  • Token

    weight 30%
    30
    Capped · max 40

    LP neither burned nor locked (0% on Meteora DAMM v2) → max 40

    The launch was captured by snipers and bundles who took over half the supply and have since sold, liquidity is thin, and a funder cluster still holds about 8.8%.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Main PumpSwap pool LP 100% burned
    • Deployer holds 0% and has no prior launches
    • Snipers now hold almost nothing

    Lowered the score

    • 34 wallets sniped 54% of supply in 10 seconds
    • Same-funder bundles took 14.4% and 10.4%
    • Funder cluster holds ~8.8% now
    • Thin liquidity (~$5.6k)
    • Small Meteora pool LP neither burned nor locked
    • Deployer's funder also funded launch-bundle wallets
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    55

    The X account predates the token and is open about the audit and the paid listing, but the team is anonymous and the token launched on Solana before the product exists there.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Account and site created ~2 months before mint
    • Openly says the audit is not started
    • Dexscreener payment disclosed

    Lowered the score

    • Solana token live before any Solana product
    • No named team or identity proof
    • Unsourced scam/rug replies
  • Website

    weight 10%
    50

    The site is a real, recent project site, but it still describes a Robinhood Chain tool, its pages contradict each other, and its key claims cannot be verified.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Site links to the correct mint
    • Audit status described honestly

    Lowered the score

    • Docs say no contracts exist; the contracts page lists deployed ones
    • Footer still describes a Robinhood Chain-only product
    • Domain only ~2 months old
    • Product claims unverifiable on-chain