Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 06 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC

RAM Truck $RAM

C8WvgVddkYYrw4r2ihjpDKYpraiscdJaYr6eNPSipump

Verdict

Caution

60/100 safety

Mint and freeze revoked, metadata locked; sells work at 0% tax, but the deployer sold 96.6% within an hour.

The token itself is clean: no one can mint new tokens, freeze wallets or change the metadata, and selling works with no tax. The risk is in who traded it. Within the first hour the creator sold almost all of their tokens, and snipers and bundled wallets grabbed a large share at launch and have already sold. A group of seven wallets funded from one source still holds about 8.5% of supply. The project is anonymous, its X account shows only launch-day promotion, and its website is a one-day-old page that still lists the contract address as pending.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    88
  • Token
    38
  • Social / X
    32
  • Website
    38

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
Renounced
77% / 0%

NarrativeHot

Trend scout · Grok 4.7 · X search via twitterapi.io

68/100 heat

A separate score, not part of the safety score: hype never makes a contract safer.

  • Solana memecoin
  • RAM shortage
  • AI data centers
Fit
Core: the product is this narrative
Buzz
Organic51 posts from 42 accounts; 2% of authors have accounts under 30 days old; 10 post(s) with engagement that does not fit the follower count.
Momentum
Rough project mentions jumped from about 138 to about 41,100 week over week (up ~298×); broader memecoin talk was roughly flat and RAM-shortage posts were only about 10.

RAM Truck is a pump.fun Solana memecoin whose site story says a truck is hauling DDR5 back from data centers. On X, the matching posts are mostly short call-group messages citing the contract and claimed gains, not discussion of the RAM shortage. The account has 31 followers.

Posts and accounts (4 posts)
  • @sol_lord111 · 06 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC

    “8x up from my call on $Ram Ca>> C8WvgVddkYYrw4r2ihjpDKYpraiscdJaYr6eNPSipump”

  • @MoonScoutt · 06 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC

    “$RAM was spotted early at just $38K MC through our TG call!”

  • @degenhousepro · 06 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC

    “$RAM x8 — mcap $18.9k → $151.5k in 40 min”

  • @Charlie_SOL23 · 06 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC

    “$RAM — $150K MC $18.5K → $150K! RAM is turning heads.”

Who pushes it

Posts, last 7 days vs the 7 before

  • project: ~41100 vs 138 (up 297.8× (rough))
  • memecoin: ~26802 vs 19723 (flat (rough))
  • RAM shortage: 10 (no comparison)

~ = estimated from one page of results

Measured in code from 51 posts by 42 accounts: 2% fresh accounts (< 30 days), 0% near-copies, top 3 accounts wrote 18%.

X posts searched from 2026-10-07 to 2026-11-07 (UTC). Post links come only from the X search results.

MC at check
$114.2K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
$35.0K

$RAM · Live price chart

Live chart

The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.

LIVE
DexScreener · pumpswap · pair DLogaa…CysC

Key findings

  • HighDeployer sold 96.6% of their tokens
  • LowLaunch sniped: 14 wallets took 18.3% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)
  • LowOld X account with 31 followers is active only on launch day
  • LowX replies are bot-like 100x and follow-back promotion
  • GoodMint and freeze authorities revoked; no one can print or freeze

What would change the verdict

  • Lowers safety:The 7-wallet group funded by one source sells its remaining ~8.5% of supply → down
  • Lowers safety:The 22.6% of pool LP tokens not burned is withdrawn from the PumpSwap pool → down
  • Raises safety:The remaining LP tokens are burned, so all pool liquidity is permanently locked → up

Unlock PRO for this project

A one-time payment adds hourly re-checks for good, a 7-day watch, questions to the jury, the launch map and deeper social forensics.

Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

7 findings

Risks (5)

  • HighDeployer sold 96.6% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

    The deployer wallet has sold 96.6% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 96.5943

    Confirmed by: facts

  • LowLaunch sniped: 14 wallets took 18.3% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

    The launch was captured: 14 wallets bought 18.3% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

    Evidence

    • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=14, pctSupplyBought=18.2601, pctSupplyHeldNow=0

    Confirmed by: facts

  • LowOld X account with 31 followers is active only on launch daysocialAI

    @RAM_truckup was created on 2012-07-22 but has only 31 followers and is not verified. Every post the tools returned is from the launch day (2026-11-06), starting a couple of hours before the token and then promoting the CA, a paid DEX listing, and boosts. No older posts were returned, so a prior identity is unverifiable, but the age-versus-activity gap is consistent with a long-dormant or renamed account rather than a project with a real history. The site names no person; the story is anonymous fiction.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowX replies are bot-like 100x and follow-back promotionsocialAI

    Replies under @RAM_truckup in the first hour are almost all engagement bait: '100x', follow-back requests, and accounts asking to be DMed. That is paid-or-bot hype, not independent holders vouching for the project. No credible third-party post calling this mint a rug or honeypot was found. One reply only says 'don't rug it'.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowWebsite still lists the contract address as pending after launchclaims-mismatchAI

    After launch, ramtruck.click still tells visitors the contract address is pending, while the project's own X bio and posts already publish the live mint. Anyone who only reads the site cannot check the token that is actually trading. The page is a one-day-old narrative site (domain created 2026-11-05) with no team, docs, or lock claims.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (1)

  • PositiveMint and freeze authorities revoked; no one can print or freezeownershipAI

    The supplied chain facts list owner as null and ownerRenounced as true, and deployerHistory is empty. On Solana that means mint and freeze authority are not sitting on a live owner in the facts we were given, so this report does not show an owner who can mint or freeze holders. Distribution risk (who holds supply) is separate and was not proven here.

    Evidence

    • on-chainowner = null; ownerRenounced = true; deployerHistory = []
      Show source
      target C8WvgVddkYYrw4r2ihjpDKYpraiscdJaYr6eNPSipump owner null ownerRenounced true deployerHistory []

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (1)

  • InfoTeam openly disclosed paying for DEX Screener listing and boostssocialAI

    The account posted that it decided to pay for DEX and later that it was buying boosts. Per this ecosystem that is ordinary disclosed marketing, not hidden promotion and not proof the token is safe or unsafe.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    88

    Standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with all authorities revoked, immutable metadata and no risky extensions; buys and sells simulate cleanly at 0% tax.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint authority revoked
    • Freeze authority revoked
    • Metadata immutable
    • No permanent delegate, transfer hook or transfer fee
    • Buy and sell simulation pass, 0% tax

    Lowered the score

    • pump.fun and PumpSwap programs are upgradeable (Squads multisig) and not build-verified
    • PumpSwap admin can change fees or disable trading platform-wide
  • Token

    weight 30%
    38

    The launch was heavily sniped and bundled, the deployer has already sold nearly everything, and one funder-linked wallet group still holds a meaningful share.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Snipers now hold 0% of supply
    • 77% of pool LP tokens burned
    • Top-10 non-pool holders hold only ~17%
    • No prior tokens from the deployer

    Lowered the score

    • Deployer sold 96.6% of its tokens within the first hour
    • 14 snipers took 18.3% of supply in 10 seconds
    • Bundled buys took about 17% at launch
    • 7 wallets funded by one source hold ~8.5% now
    • 22.6% of LP tokens not burned
    • Liquidity only about $33k
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    32

    The X account is anonymous, has only 31 followers despite a 2012 creation date, and posts launch-day promotion with bot-like replies.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Paid DEX Screener listing openly disclosed
    • No credible third-party rug or honeypot warnings found

    Lowered the score

    • 2012 account with 31 followers, active only on launch day
    • Replies are generic 100x and follow-back bait
    • No named or verified team
  • Website

    weight 10%
    38

    A one-day-old static landing page with a fictional story; it still shows the contract address as pending and makes no checkable claims.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Openly states its MemoryLink story is fiction
    • No wallet-connect or drainer behaviour found

    Lowered the score

    • Domain registered one day before launch
    • Site still says the contract address is pending
    • No team, docs or roadmap