Hooked $HOOKED

Risks (5)

• MediumOne funder's 12 wallets bundled 6.7% of supplysnipersDeterministic

  12 wallets funded by the same address duss7rcr7otlhjm29qq8nwdviaahtu58qqxajvyakgbn bought 6.7% of the supply together (blocks 451420808, 451420825). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

  Evidence

  • on-chainbundles with commonFunder duss7rcr7otlhjm29qq8nwdviaahtu58qqxajvyakgbn: 12 wallets, pctSupply 6.7

  Confirmed by: facts

• MediumToken name, symbol and image can still be changedownershipDeterministic

  The token metadata is mutable (update authority Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2). The holder can rename the token or swap its logo/links later — used in impersonation and bait-and-switch scams.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmetadata.mutable = true; updateAuthority = Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2
  • on-chainAUTHORITY update = Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2 (wallet)
  • on-chainmetadataMutable = true, settableBy: update authority Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowLaunch sniped: 11 wallets took 12.9% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

  The launch was captured: 11 wallets bought 12.9% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=11, pctSupplyBought=12.8729, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks 25, pctSupplyBought 12.8729, pctSupplyHeldNow 0
  • on-chainLaunch slot 451420760; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 11 buys by 11 wallets in window

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowFunder-linked wallet groups still hold about 10% of supplyinsidersAI

  Several same-block bundles bought at launch, some funded by a common wallet. For example, one bundle in block 451420812 bought 4.62% and was funded by ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ. That funder itself is now the #3 holder with 3.6569%. Other funding clusters hold 5.56% (funder iGdFcQoyR2MwbXMHQskhmNsqddZ6rinsipHc4TNSdwu) and 2.54% (funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe). Another holds 2.27% (funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9). Common funders can be exchanges or bots, so this is a signal of coordinated holders, not proof. None is linked to the deployer in the facts.

  Evidence

  • on-chainbundle block 451420812 commonFunder ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ pctSupply 4.6234
  • on-chaintopHolder ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ pct 3.6569
  • on-chaincluster funder iGdFcQoyR2MwbXMHQskhmNsqddZ6rinsipHc4TNSdwu wallets 9BMzTpSo4URse1oN666pmexhdjpU1vA5p7LtroCFQdLU, 6QDHbo5nLpNU1ymmXacXZMmVZY2NC4hnbMV86dTSRww1 pctSupplyHeldNow 5.5572
  • on-chaincluster funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe pctSupplyHeldNow 2.5437
  • on-chaincluster funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9 pctSupplyHeldNow 2.2732

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowToken description promises a transfer hook it does not haveclaims-mismatchAI

  The off-chain description says "Solana runs the transfer hook on every trade". This mint uses the classic SPL Token program, which cannot have transfer hooks; hooks only exist in Token-2022. The HOOKED token itself therefore has no built-in rules. The text likely describes the hookedpad.com launch platform, not this token. Buyers should not assume HOOKED enforces any on-chain rules.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmetadata offchain description
    Show source

    Launch a token with rules built into the token itself. Solana runs the transfer hook on every trade.

  • on-chainMINT C1mBfBoDkwWfd6uTFZp62ARHLjeVp3bDpCDMfMZtPngE program=spl-token

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (4)

• PositiveMint authority revoked: supply is fixedmintAI

  Nobody can create new HOOKED tokens. The supply is fixed at 913,377,922.97388 tokens, so holders cannot be diluted by new printing.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
  • on-chainsupply = 913377922973880 (913,377,922.97388), settableBy: fixed (mint authority revoked)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveFreeze authority revoked: no wallet can be frozenblacklistAI

  No account can freeze a holder's token account. Nobody can stop a holder from moving or selling tokens at the token level.

  Evidence

  • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveSelling works with no token taxhoneypotAI

  A Jupiter quote bought with 0.1 SOL and sold back through Meteora DLMM pool CnA7BFovX8q8gv2z9QEndo8hPi1PD5nqhABRH4rSnGEc. The round trip lost 0.89%, which is pool fees and price impact. No buy or sell tax was found. A simulated sell from an existing holder also succeeded. The token uses the plain SPL Token program, so it has no transfer-fee, hook, pause or permanent-delegate extensions.

  Evidence

  • forksell quote: 16522792042 tokens → 0.099106549 SOL; round-trip loss 0.89%
    Show source

    round-trip loss 0.89% (price impact 0.90%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)

  • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 16522792042 raw tokens by existing holder 9BMzTpSo4URse1oN666pmexhdjpU1vA5p7LtroCFQdLU succeeds
  • on-chaintokenProgram = SPL Token (TokenkegQfeZyiNwAJbNbGKPFXCWuBvf9Ss623VQ5DA)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveMain DAMM v2 pool liquidity is 93.6% lockedliquidityAI

  The token completed its Meteora Dynamic Bonding Curve and migrated to the DAMM v2 pool C7r9jXWiVYmBYR2Jj5YSLiEitUGJPjQXWeg7HPU8NwUk. This is the largest pool at about $68.5k. 93.5567% of its position liquidity is in DAMM v2 vesting or permanent lock, held under the creator's position. The bonding-curve config shows partner LP 100% locked. The deployer holds no unlocked LP in this pool.

  Evidence

  • on-chainPOOL Meteora DAMM v2 C7r9jXWiVYmBYR2Jj5YSLiEitUGJPjQXWeg7HPU8NwUk quote=SOL liquidityUsd=68520 lpBurnedPct=0 lpLockedPct=93.5567 lockedBy=DAMM v2 vesting / permanent lock
  • on-chain[launchpad] Meteora Dynamic Bonding Curve virtual pool B3he2yqtNXFJyAvVD17zfjv7rdr3uDMDVRNguzzjSFJ4: migration_progress 3, is_migrated 1
    Show source

    creator LP 0% / permanently locked 0%, partner LP 0% / locked 100%

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (8)

• LowSecondary DLMM pools have unlocked third-party liquidityliquidityAI

  Two Meteora DLMM pools hold about $26.9k and $6.7k. CnA7BFovX8q8gv2z9QEndo8hPi1PD5nqhABRH4rSnGEc is the pool Jupiter routed through. Their positions are 0% locked, but the deployer holds 0%; the providers are various other wallets. These providers can withdraw at any time, which would thin liquidity. That is normal for concentrated-liquidity pools and is not a deployer rug vector.

  Evidence

  • on-chainPOOL Meteora DLMM CnA7BFovX8q8gv2z9QEndo8hPi1PD5nqhABRH4rSnGEc quote=SOL liquidityUsd=26850 lpBurnedPct=0 lpLockedPct=0
  • on-chainPOOL Meteora DLMM FtiotJckV2ZG4S1YgJDJLiXKKDAnKWXgQxo7vxsjPwPe quote=SOL liquidityUsd=6709 lpBurnedPct=0 lpLockedPct=0

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowMeteora programs are upgradeable and not build-verifiedproxy-upgradeAI

  The Meteora Dynamic Bonding Curve, DAMM v2 and DLMM programs can all be upgraded. The upgrade authority is a program-owned account, JADaUV8kvDpDbJr55wxXJHVaBS3VCj8thZZHjfeuCVLd, not a single wallet. OtterSec reports the on-chain builds as unverified. This is shared protocol risk across all Meteora pools, not specific to this token's team.

  Evidence

  • on-chainPROGRAM launchpad dbcij3LWUppWqq96dh6gJWwBifmcGfLSB5D4DuSMaqN (Meteora Dynamic Bonding Curve) loader=bpf-upgradeable upgradeable=true upgradeAuthority=JADaUV8kvDpDbJr55wxXJHVaBS3VCj8thZZHjfeuCVLd (program) verifiedBuild=false
  • on-chainPROGRAM pool cpamdpZCGKUy5JxQXB4dcpGPiikHawvSWAd6mEn1sGG (Meteora DAMM v2) upgradeable=true upgradeAuthority=JADaUV8kvDpDbJr55wxXJHVaBS3VCj8thZZHjfeuCVLd (program) verifiedBuild=false
  • on-chainPROGRAM pool LBUZKhRxPF3XUpBCjp4YzTKgLccjZhTSDM9YuVaPwxo (Meteora DLMM) upgradeable=true upgradeAuthority=JADaUV8kvDpDbJr55wxXJHVaBS3VCj8thZZHjfeuCVLd (program) verifiedBuild=false

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoTop 10 hold 25%; deployer holds no tokensholdersAI

  The top 10 holders own 25.12%. The largest holder (6.66%) is a program-owned vault account; its purpose is not identified. The deployer holds 0%, never held tokens in the analysed history, and made no dev buy.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintop10Pct = 25.1233
  • on-chaintopHolder HLnpSz9h2S4hiLQ43rnSD9XkcUThA7B8hQMKmDaiTLcC pct 6.66 label system-owned PDA (vault: multisig / custody / program escrow)
  • on-chainDeployer Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2 holds 0% now
  • on-chaindevBuyPct = 0

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoCreator wallet collects bonding-curve trading feesfeesAI

  The deployer wallet is the fee claimer of the bonding-curve config. It can claim the fee share defined in that config through claim_trading_fee / claim_creator_trading_fee. This is a normal launchpad revenue stream and does not touch holder balances. The fee rate is not in the facts.

  Evidence

  • on-chainconfig 4URsNsFpRrtwAZFDjhzBVWp3y9nci1dChb7Vx4bahPVt (fee claimer Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2)
  • on-chainix claim_trading_fee(max_amount_a: u64, max_amount_b: u64) signers=[fee_claimer]

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoDomain registered one day before launch; no prior tokens foundwebsiteAI

  hookedpad.com was registered on 2026-09-27, one day before the token was created on 2026-09-28. This is a young project with no long track record. The deployer-history scan only reaches back to 2026-10-29 and found no other mints.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsite domainCreatedAt = 2026-09-27T20:22:34.000Z
  • on-chaincreatedAt=2026-09-28T20:03:03.000Z
  • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 400 most recent successful txs back to 2026-10-29T15:51:13.000Z; found 0 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
  • on-chaindeployer = Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2
    Show source

    deployerHistory: []; ownerRenounced: false; owner = Dpmutmc4ZLqvJwHbwabvKYeFJ9zkQ86nutUAUviRrXG2

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoAnonymous team; X account created alongside the launchsocialAI

  Nobody is named or doxxed in the bio or posts reviewed. The X account was created on 2026-09-27, the domain the same day, and the token the next day, so this looks like a new project rather than an old renamed account. It is verified, posts the same contract address as the site, and follows only 4 accounts. Follower quality was not independently checked.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Hoookedpad/status/2118294492126286067
    Show source

    Burn update 🪝 86.20M HOOKED burned, 8.623% of supply, 4,396 SOL spent on buybacks.

  • webhttps://www.hookedpad.com/
    Show source

    $HOOKED is live C1mBfBoDkwWfd6uTFZp62ARHLjeVp3bDpCDMfMZtPngE

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7

• Info"Dead project" replies offer no evidence of a rugsocialAI

  A few replies call the token dead or abandoned. They give no evidence of a honeypot, mint, or stolen liquidity. The official account was still posting burn updates the same day, and Birdeye and Meteora accounts posted about the token. Treat the dead-project posts as opinion, not a confirmed scam.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/0xLarp6/status/2118301214656065559
    Show source

    @Hoookedpad dead project.

  • Xhttps://x.com/MeteoraEco/status/2117998080792617318
    Show source

    6/ @Hoookedpad keeps burning. 85.12M HOOKED bought back and burned: that's 8.515% of the supply.

  • Xhttps://x.com/birdeye_so/status/2117972632683577409
    Show source

    $HOOKED from @Hoookedpad is now verified on Birdeye Terminal.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoBuyback and burn totals are self-reported, not verifiedclaims-mismatchAI

  The account repeatedly says millions of HOOKED were bought back and burned with thousands of SOL from trading fees. Meteora's account repeated one of those figures. Nothing in the facts confirms the burned amount or the fee split, so holders should not treat the burn percentage as proven.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/Hoookedpad/status/2116605420047679844
    Show source

    85.12M HOOKED have been bought back and burned, 8.515% of the entire supply GONE. 4,388 SOL spent doing it, all from trading fees on Hooked.

  • webhttps://www.hookedpad.com/
    Show source

    Every trade on a Hooked curve pays a 1% fee. 85% of it buys the Hooked token on the market and burns it; 15% funds development.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: claude-opus-5.5