bytejury.exe $Byte

Risks (7)

• HighOfficial BYTEJURY site and X do not list this Solana mintclaims-mismatchAI

  The mint under review was announced as the live $BYTE by @ByteJuryExe. The site, GitHub and security contact all point to a different account, @bytejury, whose bio gives an Ethereum-style contract, not this Solana mint. The site's own checks index says the official BYTEJURY site does not list this mint, and the nav still shows $BYTE as "soon". Buying this pump.fun mint does not mean you hold the token the project says it burns or takes as payment.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/ByteJuryExe/status/2118708314460799159
    Show source

    $BYTE is live on Solana Chain. Cybersecurity audits by AI agents. Potential exploits. Hidden permissions. Evidence behind every finding. Audit before you ape. Claims lie. Code doesn't. CA: A3jYyfHKSDhgSntsnAnSTq5ece22R9hLryo9yXZJpump

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/security
    Show source

    Please report vulnerabilities privately by direct message to @bytejury on X.

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/checks
    Show source

    BYTE … Mint and freeze revoked, sells work at 0% tax, but the official BYTEJURY site does not list this Solana mint.

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    $BYTE soon

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• MediumMint was promoted by a lookalike X handle, not the site's accountsocialAI

  The only posts of this Solana CA are from @ByteJuryExe (created 2026-10-09, 111 followers, following 1, zero likes on the launch posts, bio misspells AI as "Al"). The website and GitHub link @bytejury instead (created 2026-11-03, 98 followers, website bytejury.xyz). Mentions of @ByteJuryExe are generic follow-back / "let's pump" replies, not users of an audit product. The site's own check of @bytejuryexe found no token and no website.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://github.com/bytejury-exe
    Show source

    @bytejury on X

  • Xhttps://x.com/A80G8/status/2118691476356075536
    Show source

    @ByteJuryExe Please follow me back 🔙 let's pump your project 🚀🔥 @ByteJuryExe

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/checks
    Show source

    @bytejuryexe Project (site + X) Unknown No contract or token found; only a new, verified X account with no posts and no website was checked.

  • on-chainmetadata offchain twitter
    Show source

    "twitter":"https://x.com/bytejuryexe"

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    https://x.com/bytejury

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol, claude-opus-5.5

• MediumOfficial X claims 100% fee burn; site says half goes to treasuryclaims-mismatchAI

  @bytejury (the account the site names) says 100% of revenue from paid audit requests is already directed to burning $BYTE. The same project's docs and security page say each scan fee is split: half burned, half to the treasury, via ScanPayments. Holders cannot tell which token, or what share, is actually burned.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/bytejury/status/2118691481137426926
    Show source

    We already direct 100% of revenue from paid audit requests toward burning $BYTE.

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/security
    Show source

    Calls requestScan(chain, address) on ScanPayments. Half the payment is burned, half goes to the treasury.

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    Each scan fee is split on-chain by the ScanPayments contract between a burn and the treasury.

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• MediumVery thin liquidity: bonding curve only ~6% completeliquidityAI

  The token has not graduated. It trades only on the pump.fun bonding curve EwUk8UEhLeuB3fxjWnX2wM5NnkpH7eSUkVbSj5Y9p68F at about 6% progress, with very small real quote reserves. The creator cannot withdraw this liquidity; the curve program holds it. Even small trades still move the price a lot (a 0.1 SOL round trip lost 7.82%). A single larger holder selling could crash the price.

  Evidence

  • on-chain[launchpad] pump.fun curve EwUk8UEhLeuB3fxjWnX2wM5NnkpH7eSUkVbSj5Y9p68F: complete=false, progress ≈ 6%
    Show source

    complete=false, progress ≈ 6% , real SOL 0.054133985

  • on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve EwUk8UEhLeuB3fxjWnX2wM5NnkpH7eSUkVbSj5Y9p68F
    Show source

    liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• Mediumpump.fun program is upgradeable by multisig and its build is unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

  The launchpad program 6EF8rrecthR5Dkzon8Nwu78hRvfCKubJ14M5uBEwF6P holds the curve liquidity. It is upgradeable by a Squads v4 multisig (7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8), and its build is not verified by OtterSec. Pump.fun admins can also change global curve parameters and fees (set_params, update_buyback_config) and reassign a coin's creator and creator fee (admin_cto, set_creator). This is platform-level trust shared by every pump.fun token, not a power of this token's creator.

  Evidence

  • on-chainPROGRAM launchpad 6EF8rrecthR5Dkzon8Nwu78hRvfCKubJ14M5uBEwF6P upgradeable=true upgradeAuthority=7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8 (multisig) verifiedBuild=false
  • on-chainix set_params(... fee_basis_points: u64, withdraw_authority: pubkey ...) signers=[authority] risk=high
  • on-chainix admin_cto(is_holder_reward: Option<bool>, creator_fee_bps: Option<u64>, new_creator: Option<pubkey>) signers=[admin_set_creator_authority] risk=high

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowDay-old website runs an Ethereum-wallet app on a different chainwebsiteAI

  The site describes an AI audit product. Its domain was registered about 8 hours before the token was created. The site links contracts on a Robinhood-chain block explorer, and its app wallet modal only supports Ethereum wallets. Nothing in the material ties the Solana token to that product on-chain, so any utility for Byte holders is unverified.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    https://robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/address/0x9F20472903486F732C9861E516c1C238Fd2e56B3

  • forkdappTests claim https://bytejury.site/app
    Show source

    No claim feature exists on BYTEJURY, and the wallet connect modal only supports Ethereum wallets.

  • on-chainsite domainCreatedAt = 2026-11-06T05:53:54.723Z

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowHomepage gives two different counts of AI agentswebsiteAI

  The same homepage says both "Five AI agents audit the code" and "Six AI agents. One verdict." Docs and the official @bytejury account say six. That does not drain wallets, but the product description is inconsistent on day one of the domain (created 2026-11-06, same day as this mint).

  Evidence

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    Five AI agents audit the code behind a project

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/
    Show source

    Six AI agents. One verdict.

  • webhttps://bytejury.site/docs
    Show source

    A jury of six AI agents audits the code behind a project

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (4)

• PositiveMint authority revoked: supply fixed at 1 billionmintAI

  No one can create new Byte tokens. The mint authority is null, so the supply stays at 1,000,000,000 (6 decimals) and holders cannot be diluted by new printing.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    Show source

    mintAuthority = null (revoked)

  • on-chainsupply
    Show source

    1000000000000000 (1,000,000,000)

  • on-chainowner=null; ownerRenounced=true; target=A3jYyfHKSDhgSntsnAnSTq5ece22R9hLryo9yXZJpump

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveFreeze authority revoked: no wallet can be frozenblacklistAI

  The freeze authority is null. Nobody can freeze a holder's token account to stop them from selling.

  Evidence

  • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
    Show source

    freezeAuthority = null (revoked)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveMetadata immutable and no risky Token-2022 extensionsotherAI

  The token uses Token-2022 with only the metadataPointer and tokenMetadata extensions, and both have no authority. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee, no default-frozen state and no pausable extension. The name 'bytejury.exe' and symbol 'Byte' cannot be changed later.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata: "bytejury.exe" (Byte); update authority none (immutable)
    Show source

    update authority none (immutable)

  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer: pointer authority none
    Show source

    pointer authority none

  • on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveSells work in simulation with 0% token taxhoneypotAI

  A Jupiter buy and sell quote both succeeded. A read-only sell simulation from an existing holder also succeeded. Buy and sell tax measured 0%. The 7.82% round-trip loss comes from price impact on very thin liquidity plus pump.fun fees, not from a token tax.

  Evidence

  • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 2562997655040 raw tokens by existing holder 7FD9gw6GjzvGVUdoPjD2VFqfdfiemwHATdrrantNKKjD succeeds
    Show source

    succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)

  • forksell quote: 2562997655040 tokens → 0.092177131 SOL; round-trip loss 7.82%
    Show source

    round-trip loss 7.82% (price impact 7.91%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (2)

• InfoOnly 3 holders; no snipers or bundles; dev holds 1.47%holdersAI

  There are only 3 holders right now. The bonding curve holds 95.24%, one wallet holds 3.29% and the deployer holds 1.47%. The deployer bought 1.09% at launch and has sold nothing. No buys happened in the 25-slot sniper window and no bundles were detected. The holder data is very early and can change fast.

  Evidence

  • on-chainholdersCount: 3; topHolders 7FD9gw6GjzvGVUdoPjD2VFqfdfiemwHATdrrantNKKjD 3.2888%
    Show source

    Deployer CC1hXhEzzVDKNwUWeGGLJrTZjSmTTpYYWwChBRMeQnkC holds 1.4725% now

  • on-chainLaunch slot 466138886; sniper window 25 slots
    Show source

    0 buys by 0 wallets in window

  • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 0; devBuyPct = 1.0884

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoFresh deployer wallet with no earlier token launchesdeployer-historyAI

  The creator's full history (26 transactions) shows only this one mint, so there is no earlier rug record. There is also no track record. The deployer was first funded by dxQEhioW6HqRR1QpB457zwP67kKvoenUrUXnv2yEztz, whose history was not analysed.

  Evidence

  • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 26 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
  • on-chainDeployer was first funded by dxQEhioW6HqRR1QpB457zwP67kKvoenUrUXnv2yEztz

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol