Prop AMM Teardown Engine $TEARDOWN

Risks (6)

• HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

  The deployer wallet has sold 100% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

  Evidence

  • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100
  • on-chainDeployer bought/received 2% of supply at launch (slot 465393062–465393063)
  • on-chainDeployer 6DwXCBUt3e9HwSgNbEG9LNgnavcN5SKwESZzqzSfbffW holds 0% now

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• HighLaunch sniped: 11 wallets took 53.7% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

  The launch was captured: 11 wallets bought 53.7% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=11, pctSupplyBought=53.7221, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
  • on-chainsnipers: pctSupplyBought 53.7221, pctSupplyHeldNow 0, windowSeconds 10
  • on-chainbundles: block 465393062 wallets 2SsajKL6jC7XzsiDBkSkmEFkR5bEXTjxBihKqWX9HGwt, AdNWYrjpaRgdXx5ozmiwGMz1rw59jYTATyGJYXc4ZddB, haqq6qnVBCZt97amh9VUFZRFCkD6NJxoYifacCuqqqq pctSupply 26.5746
  • on-chainLaunch slot 465393062; sniper window 25 slots (≈10s at 400 ms/slot); 12 buys by 11 wallets in window — early history truncated at 1000 txs (slot 465393092), figures are a lower bound

  Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

• MediumFour top holders share one funder and hold 7.25% togetherholdersAI

  Wallets 4QuZRyFn1gA9CzgXF4fiYCeH2qDK2LouuFECw2e3gKKr, 4ZXddYkBBbFYTpdnd6fwoUFqLsh5E2kNWFNduvKkrAg3, 67QcvuVdFo1fdYebqbVKKycNo82QWUHaLHBNQRsy46RJ and 83igE8BMvKcxeQYRwtyUunoFL5gASWVJ5vXEGgwaeN3E were all funded by 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9. They may be one entity spreading its holdings, which could be sold together. A shared funder could also be an exchange, so this is a signal, not proof.

  Evidence

  • on-chainclusters: funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9, pctSupplyHeldNow 7.251
  • on-chainCommon funders may be exchanges / bots funding many unrelated wallets — clusters are a signal, not proof

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: grok-4.7

• MediumBounty pot USDC is held by operator-controlled server keyswebsiteAI

  Anyone who chips USDC into a pot sends it to an escrow key the site keeps in server secrets. There is no on-chain program enforcing refunds or the 90/10 payout. The keeper wallet is supposed to send refunds and payouts, but a person who controls those keys can move the USDC. The vault page currently shows 0.00 USDC and no Monday run yet, so nothing is sitting there now. Token holders are not drained by this; people who later fund a pot are trusting the operator.

  Evidence

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/docs/trust-model
    Show source

    The product runs without a Solana program of its own. Pots are USDC token accounts owned by per-target escrow keys

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/docs/trust-model
    Show source

    The escrow keys and the keeper key live in the site's server secrets and are never shown or logged.

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/vault
    Show source

    Keeper (fees, Memo records, refunds, payouts)
    2cNfNTMpXuFZRtMWFvydgJxDq3Z2ZoiPVVNQtzFpuC6N

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/vault
    Show source

    0.00
    USDC held now

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/
    Show source

    10 prop AMMs, 0.00 USDC in pots

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowWebsite and X account created the same day as the tokenwebsiteAI

  propammengine.xyz was registered on 2026-11-04 at 13:29 UTC, about four hours before the token was created. It has no Wayback history. The project is brand new and has no track record.

  Evidence

  • on-chainsite.domainCreatedAt = 2026-11-04T13:29:59.000Z; waybackSnapshots = []
  • Xhttps://x.com/propammengine/status/2118040812391219249
    Show source

    $TEARDOWN is live. A rebuilt AMM program replays real mainnet calls and every byte matches the original.

  • webhttps://www.propammengine.xyz/
  • on-chaindeployedAt=2026-11-04T17:54:43.000Z; deployerHistory=[]
    Show source

    mint deployed 2026-11-04; deployer history empty

  • Xhttps://x.com/0xzakk_/status/2118390268408046064
    Show source

    @propammengine Last project did 5m+ Won’t fade it this at 10k

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• LowClaimed one-year dev-supply lock is not visible on-chainclaims-mismatchAI

  The project account says the dev supply is locked for one year and links an image. Contract basics list the deployer and say the mint owner is renounced, but they do not show a lock, a locker, or a dev balance. Treat the lock as unverified until a Solscan lock or transaction is checked.

  Evidence

  • Xhttps://x.com/propammengine/status/2118041386784264588
    Show source

    The dev supply is locked for one year.

  • on-chainowner=null; ownerRenounced=true; deployer=6DwXCBUt3e9HwSgNbEG9LNgnavcN5SKwESZzqzSfbffW; deployerHistory=[]
    Show source

    owner null and renounced; no lock or dev-balance fact supplied

  Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: claude-opus-5.5

Positive signals (5)

• PositiveMint and freeze authority revoked: fixed supply, no wallet freezingmintAI

  Nobody can create new TEARDOWN tokens, so the supply of about 999,999,997.74 is fixed. Nobody can freeze a holder's token account to stop them selling.

  Evidence

  • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
  • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
  • on-chainowner=null; ownerRenounced=true
    Show source

    owner null, ownerRenounced true

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveToken name, logo and links can never be changedownershipAI

  The Token-2022 metadata has no update authority and the metadata pointer has no authority. The token cannot be renamed or given a new logo later to impersonate another project.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "Prop AMM Teardown Engine" (TEARDOWN); update authority none (immutable)
  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at 8htXY4VqMgwSkzpJ9UiMLPaGo7z4QLGEDhXseQS3pump; pointer authority none

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveNo risky Token-2022 extensions like delegate, hook or transfer feehidden-functionAI

  The mint uses Token-2022, but its only extensions are metadataPointer and tokenMetadata. It has no permanent delegate that could take tokens, no transfer hook that could block transfers, no transfer fee, no default-frozen state and no pause.

  Evidence

  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null
  • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveSelling works in simulation with no buy or sell taxhoneypotAI

  A Jupiter quote round-trip through the pump.fun curve lost 2.82%, which comes from price impact and the normal curve fees. No buy or sell tax was found. A read-only simulated sell from an existing holder succeeded.

  Evidence

  • forksell quote: 1088089455452 tokens → 0.097175428 SOL; round-trip loss 2.82% (price impact 2.83%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
  • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 1088089455452 raw tokens by existing holder CAtKjdEySFyLdsgb8gZ2nZuKDv4eUwyShPPHstwz9y3T succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• PositiveLiquidity sits in the pump.fun curve; creator cannot pull itliquidityAI

  The token has not graduated (curve progress about 60.13%, about 24.0 SOL in real reserves). Liquidity is held by the pump.fun curve program, not by the creator. LP tokens do not exist yet. They are created at graduation, and the facts give no post-graduation pool data.

  Evidence

  • on-chain[launchpad] pump.fun curve 5qHbxKVEmz94jeEfkRMK3bWvFTFQZp7mpBSeVQk9HtFu: complete=false, progress ≈ 60.13% , real SOL 24.004993006
  • on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve 5qHbxKVEmz94jeEfkRMK3bWvFTFQZp7mpBSeVQk9HtFu: liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (2)

• Lowpump.fun program is upgradeable by its multisig, build unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

  The launchpad program that holds the curve liquidity can have its code replaced by upgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8, a Squads v4 multisig. Its build is not verified by OtterSec. Admin instructions such as set_params, admin_cto and update_global_authority let pump.fun change curve fees and creator settings. This is platform-level trust shared by every pump.fun token. The TEARDOWN creator does not control it.

  Evidence

  • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
  • on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified
  • on-chainix set_params(...) signers=[authority] risk=high — requires privileged signer authority

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

• InfoCreator wallet has launched no other tokensdeployer-historyAI

  A scan of the creator's full history (47 transactions) found only this one mint. There are no earlier launches to judge, good or bad. The wallet was first funded by F13wRempP4yoN719RZENxJ7EiWpLijhToZjFxrTHostm.

  Evidence

  • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 47 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
  • on-chainDeployer was first funded by F13wRempP4yoN719RZENxJ7EiWpLijhToZjFxrTHostm

  Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol