Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC

StonkMarket $STM

8gnyYyngFtzPP6K9YRQ8a7kZWKQ5tzu5N2D23Rafxrn5

Verdict

Caution

54/100 safety

Mint and freeze revoked, metadata still editable; sells work at 0% tax; 72.6% sniped at launch, LP unlocked.

Snipers captured this launch: 17 wallets bought about 72.6% of the supply within 10 seconds and have since sold out, and the deployer sold all of its tokens. Liquidity in the main pool is neither burned nor locked, so whoever holds those LP tokens could pull it, and the token name and logo can still be changed. On the positive side, nobody can mint new tokens or freeze wallets, there are no hidden token fees, and selling works with no tax.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    78
  • Token
    28
  • Social / X
    45
  • Website
    35

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
0% / 0%

NarrativeCooling

Trend scout · Grok 4.7 · X search via twitterapi.io

34/100 heat

A separate score, not part of the safety score: hype never makes a contract safer.

  • token launchpad
  • social tipping
  • memecoin
Fit
Core: the product is this narrative
Buzz
Mixed52 posts from 42 accounts; 9 of 52 posts are near-copies (largest group 5); 2% of authors have accounts under 30 days old; 2 post(s) with engagement that does not fit the follower count.
Momentum
Project ticker mentions are roughly flat week over week (~831 vs ~867); much of that is STMicroelectronics stock noise, while real StonkMarket talk stays small. Broader memecoin talk is roughly up 3.1

StonkMarket’s own posts pitch token launches on LaunchOnSF and X tips paid in STONK. Search volume for $STM is roughly flat, but many hits are the chip-stock ticker, charts, and WhatsApp spam. Direct project replies are few, mostly small accounts, with low likes and views.

Posts and accounts (5 posts)
  • @sendhelp6969 · 01 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC

    “@stonkmarket_SOL This is incredible. Absolutely crushing it!”

  • @CeegCrypto · 30 Oct 2026, 06:12 UTC

    “$STM going to change the meme space for the better.”

  • @RepYourCity · 30 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC

    “LIVE AIRDROP: StonkMarket $STM on Solana! Explore this memecoin token”

  • @Drallio · 29 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC

    “@HeyItsMeTheDev @stonkmarket_SOL yes i hold a bag here”

  • @HitmanFrez · 31 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC

    “Swept 2% $stm yesterday man I could build better stuff and it’s mostly ai slop”

Who pushes it

Competing for the same narrative

pump.fun

Posts, last 7 days vs the 7 before

  • project: ~831 vs 867 (flat (rough))
  • memecoin: ~33299 vs 10627 (up 3.1× (rough))
  • token launchpad: ~944 (no comparison)

~ = estimated from one page of results

Measured in code from 52 posts by 42 accounts: 2% fresh accounts (< 30 days), 17% near-copies, top 3 accounts wrote 21%.

X posts searched from 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-06 (UTC). Post links come only from the X search results.

MC at check
$27.9K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
$15.0K

$STM · Live price chart

Live chart

The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.

LIVE
DexScreener · raydium · pair AzX4s5…LLWz

Key findings

  • HighPool liquidity is neither burned nor locked
  • HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokens
  • HighLaunch sniped: 17 wallets took 72.6% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)
  • HighMain Raydium pool LP (~$15k) is not burned or locked
  • GoodMint authority revoked: no new tokens can be printed

What would change the verdict

  • Raises safety:Main Raydium CPMM LP tokens are burned or shown in a recognised long-term lock → token score up
  • Raises safety:Metadata update authority is revoked, making name, symbol and logo immutable → contract score up
  • Lowers safety:Unidentified LP holder withdraws the ~$15k STM/STONK liquidity → down
  • Lowers safety:The 5-wallet funder cluster sells its remaining 3.1% into thin liquidity → down

Unlock PRO for this project

A one-time payment adds hourly re-checks for good, a 7-day watch, questions to the jury, the launch map and deeper social forensics.

Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

17 findings

Risks (7)

  • HighPool liquidity is neither burned nor lockedliquidityDeterministic

    Only 0% of the Meteora DAMM v2 pool's LP is burned or locked. Whoever holds the LP tokens can withdraw the liquidity ("rug pull") at any time.

    Evidence

    • on-chainpool 6uSGjtMWpiDLnxueJ65AjADDrMWFUjB8zS9odjdm4ozi (Meteora DAMM v2): lpBurnedPct=0, lpLockedPct=0

    Confirmed by: facts

  • HighDeployer sold 100% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic

    The deployer wallet has sold 100% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100
    • on-chainDeployer bought/received 2.2569% of supply at launch (slot 461554961–461554962)
    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 100; Deployer 7ty4r8EwnSqnRud4C5Sw4EJoLEJ4mEPHab1inZrmpeqG holds 0% now

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • HighLaunch sniped: 17 wallets took 72.6% of supply in 10 seconds (25 slots)snipersDeterministic

    The launch was captured: 17 wallets bought 72.6% of the supply within 10 seconds (25 slots). A small, fast group set the early price and could sell into everyone who bought later — bad for launch fairness and a strong insider/bot signal. They now hold 0% of supply, so current dump pressure from them is low — most of it was already sold, i.e. they exited on later buyers.

    Evidence

    • on-chainsnipers: windowBlocks=25, wallets=17, pctSupplyBought=72.6305, pctSupplyHeldNow=0
    • on-chainsnipers: 17 wallets, pctSupplyBought 72.6305, pctSupplyHeldNow 0, windowSeconds 10
    • on-chainbundle block 461554964 wallets 8zkbNeDvsacvNjAbta77y6TPTxDd8WzQRjHkq8X5f1oF, 3BTBDzB1yu3U9WSWVqUQ6wmaMPSd3y51rvhwUm1iJYU1 pctSupply 21.6158

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • HighMain Raydium pool LP (~$15k) is not burned or lockedliquidityAI

    The Raydium CPMM pool AzX4s55RJm2W4GjF3jz3KVdcRmbwn4Jr1upcvFPvLLWz holds about $14,953 of liquidity. Its LP tokens are reported 0% burned and 0% locked, and the deployer holds none of them. Whoever holds the LP tokens can withdraw that liquidity. The facts do not identify that holder. The LaunchLab migration instruction includes a lock program, so the LP may sit in a locker the scanner did not recognise, but this is unverified. The secondary Meteora DAMM v2 pool holds only $3 and has no burned or locked positions.

    Evidence

    • on-chain[pools] Raydium CPMM AzX4s55RJm2W4GjF3jz3KVdcRmbwn4Jr1upcvFPvLLWz: pool lp_supply 117294904617110, LP mint supply 117294904617010 → 0% burned (Burn instructions + incinerator), locked 0%, deployer 0%
    • on-chainPOOL Meteora DAMM v2 6uSGjtMWpiDLnxueJ65AjADDrMWFUjB8zS9odjdm4ozi quote=SOL liquidityUsd=3 lpBurnedPct=0 lpLockedPct=0

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • MediumToken name, symbol and image can still be changedownershipDeterministic

    The token metadata is mutable (update authority WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh). The holder can rename the token or swap its logo/links later — used in impersonation and bait-and-switch scams.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmetadata.mutable = true; updateAuthority = WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh
    • on-chainAUTHORITY update = WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh (pda) [off-curve address with no account (PDA)]
    • on-chainmetadataMutable = true, settableBy: update authority WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh

    Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowOne funder links 5 wallets still holding 3.1% of supplyinsidersAI

    Wallet 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9 funded 5 wallets. These include a sniper (HP7SNNEXqoVHccXbkyNV27bQqVJFXvqgTDRp4UwXVQEL) and a same-slot bundle pair. Together they still hold 3.13% of supply, which could be one entity's position. A common funder is a signal, not proof.

    Evidence

    • on-chaincluster funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9 wallets FqR1E3pRsgvBeQDvPppHz2yZufTmqHUcW2xDMQZi1A8v, HP7SNNEXqoVHccXbkyNV27bQqVJFXvqgTDRp4UwXVQEL, 69pDoe9j5MVh4vwLtVeEuLH29MuLD869qFDhVKaunnQz, CxiknFANgzJDuZdxtqfHnPXyvEfZvQxnb1c1rgsb62GN, 8519UYdrAivG44oMNZAKK5rZZbqCNv49rpJwEZ7QR1q pctSupplyHeldNow 3.1326

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: grok-4.7

  • LowWebsite domain differs from the one in token metadatawebsiteAI

    The token metadata and launchpad record list https://stonkmarket.net/. The fetched site was https://stonkmarket.tech/, a domain created on 2026-10-27, one day after the token launched on 2026-10-26. Both domains are very new, and the mismatch makes it harder to know which site is official.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol

Positive signals (4)

  • PositiveMint authority revoked: no new tokens can be printedmintAI

    Nobody can create new STM tokens. The supply is permanently fixed at 894,864,079.144402 STM, so holders cannot be diluted by new printing.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainsupply = 894864079144402 (894,864,079.144402), settableBy: fixed (mint authority revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveFreeze authority revoked: wallets cannot be frozenblacklistAI

    Nobody can freeze a holder's token account. The token cannot be turned into a honeypot through freezing.

    Evidence

    • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveNo risky Token-2022 extensions such as fees or hooksotherAI

    The mint runs on Token-2022 but has only two extensions: metadataPointer, whose pointer authority is none, and tokenMetadata. There is no permanent delegate, no transfer hook, no transfer fee, no default-frozen state, no pause and no non-transferable flag. Nobody can move holders' tokens, block transfers or add a tax at the token level.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at 8gnyYyngFtzPP6K9YRQ8a7kZWKQ5tzu5N2D23Rafxrn5; pointer authority none
    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=medium authority=WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSelling works with 0% tax in simulationhoneypotAI

    A buy-then-sell round trip of 0.1 SOL loses 2.74%, which is fully explained by price impact and pool fees. The measured buy and sell taxes are 0%. A read-only sell simulation by an existing holder succeeded.

    Evidence

    • forksell quote: 307671181407 tokens → 0.097262764 SOL; round-trip loss 2.74%
    • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 307671181407 raw tokens by existing holder AJdTZLSYMEXStkzoBQGo842ePFwavPRss39devUGX1va succeeds

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (6)

  • LowMain pool is paired with STONK, so price depends on STONKliquidityAI

    The graduated Raydium CPMM pool pairs STM with the token STONK (6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx), not SOL or USDC. STM's value in SOL therefore also depends on STONK's price and liquidity. Jupiter routes sells through Manifest and then Raydium CP. STONK's own authorities and liquidity were not analysed here.

    Evidence

    • on-chainRaydium CPMM AzX4s55RJm2W4GjF3jz3KVdcRmbwn4Jr1upcvFPvLLWz quoteMint 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx quoteSymbol STONK
    • forkdex: jupiter (Manifest → Raydium CP)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowRaydium and Meteora programs are upgradeable and their builds are unverifiedproxy-upgradeAI

    Raydium LaunchLab (LanMV9sAd7wArD4vJFi2qDdfnVhFxYSUg6eADduJ3uj) and Raydium CPMM (CPMMoo8L3F4NbTegBCKVNunggL7H1ZpdTHKxQB5qKP1C) can have their code replaced by the Squads v4 multisig vault FytDrVzDybM1TwFQPGb8qaxZR7dBCzNeqT3vtQsceZQK. The Meteora DAMM v2 program is upgradeable by a program/PDA authority. None of these builds is OtterSec-verified. This is standard infrastructure risk shared by all tokens on these venues, not something specific to this project.

    Evidence

    • on-chainupgrade authority FytDrVzDybM1TwFQPGb8qaxZR7dBCzNeqT3vtQsceZQK: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
    • on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoHolder concentration is moderate across 501 holdersholdersAI

    Excluding the Raydium pool authority (28.9%), the top 10 wallets hold 27.16% of supply. The largest single wallet holds 4.44%. There are 501 holders, and fresh wallets hold about 3.6%.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintop10Pct 27.1646; holdersCount 501; freshWalletsPct 3.5859
    • on-chaintopHolder AJdTZLSYMEXStkzoBQGo842ePFwavPRss39devUGX1va 4.4391%

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoWebsite is a single sentence on a domain newer than the tokenwebsiteAI

    stonkmarket.tech only says STM launches tokens from the web or by tagging the X account. There are no docs, team names, fee-mode details, or audit claims on the page. The domain was registered the day after the mint, so the public site does not back the longer product history described on X. That is a transparency gap, not proof of a rug.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      STM launches tokens through StonkMarket from the web or by tagging @stonkmarket_SOL on X.
    • on-chaindeployedAt=2026-10-26T06:02:17.000Z; domainCreatedAt=2026-10-27T11:03:50.002Z
      Show source
      Token deployed 2026-10-26; domain created 2026-10-27.

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoX account is verified but was created on launch daysocialAI

    @stonkmarket_SOL was created about 3.5 hours before the mint (2026-10-26), is verified, and has 692 followers with posts typically getting 20–50 likes. That engagement is in line with the follower count, not a huge bot spike. The team is not named, and posts do not claim a doxx. Burn and “300 tokens launched” claims are not checked against chain data here.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7

  • InfoDeployer made one other token with an unknown outcomedeployer-historyAI

    The deployer created one other mint, 2pt6tJECjsJJa9wrfCN9Va9pk4Jnvh6gNoCBiNZwsCuU, on 2026-11-02. It has no market data, so no rug history can be confirmed or excluded.

    Evidence

    • on-chaindeployerHistory 2pt6tJECjsJJa9wrfCN9Va9pk4Jnvh6gNoCBiNZwsCuU: unknown — no market data; created in tx 63wtuH8w2RxbmEmvA8mdRTTkEC1MtEMyAaYr2MhbfxDpzURhs7Bmdu8H9Dtfiv79hKMndHheu8tgnBqFakywdFuB
    • on-chaindeployer=7ty4r8EwnSqnRud4C5Sw4EJoLEJ4mEPHab1inZrmpeqG; deployerHistory token 2pt6tJECjsJJa9wrfCN9Va9pk4Jnvh6gNoCBiNZwsCuU createdAt 2026-11-02T19:16:21.000Z outcome unknown
      Show source
      outcome: unknown

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    78
    Capped · max 80

    metadata is mutable → max 80

    The token is a standard Token-2022 mint with no risky extensions and a working 0% tax sell; the only live token-level power is the mutable metadata.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint authority revoked, supply fixed
    • Freeze authority revoked
    • No transfer fee, hook or permanent delegate
    • Buy and sell simulation pass at 0% tax

    Lowered the score

    • Metadata can still be changed by a PDA update authority
    • Launchpad and pool programs are upgradeable and their builds are unverified
  • Token

    weight 30%
    28
    Capped · max 40

    LP neither burned nor locked (0% on Meteora DAMM v2) → max 40

    The launch was captured by snipers who bought 72.6% and have fully exited, the deployer sold everything, and pool liquidity is neither burned nor locked.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Holder concentration now moderate (top 10 hold ~27%)
    • Snipers and deployer no longer hold supply

    Lowered the score

    • 17 wallets took 72.6% of supply in the first 10 seconds
    • Deployer sold 100% of the tokens it received
    • Main pool LP (~$15k) is 0% burned and 0% locked
    • Main pool is paired with STONK rather than SOL
    • One funder links wallets still holding 3.1%
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    45

    The X account is verified with engagement that matches its size, but it was created on launch day, the team is anonymous, and its burn claims are unverified.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Verified X account with engagement in line with followers
    • No project-specific scam reports found

    Lowered the score

    • Account created hours before the mint
    • Anonymous team
    • Burn and buyback claims not confirmed on-chain
  • Website

    weight 10%
    35

    The site is a single sentence on a domain registered after launch, and it differs from the domain listed in the token metadata.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Site loads and describes the product

    Lowered the score

    • One-line site with no docs, team or fee details
    • Domain created the day after the token launched
    • Fetched domain (.tech) differs from metadata domain (.net)