Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC
Elisym $LSM
Verdict
71/100 safety
Mint, freeze and metadata authorities revoked; sells work at 0% tax, LP burned — but dev took 26.6% and sold 95%
The token itself is clean: nobody can mint more, freeze wallets or change its details, selling works with no tax, and pool liquidity is burned. The main risks are distribution: the creator took about 26.6% of supply at launch and has since moved out or sold 95% of it, while an unidentified program account holds 25% that could be released. The project's site and posts also claim multi-chain payments are live while its own docs say they are not fully. pump.fun's multisig can still upgrade or pause its trading programs.
Score breakdown
- Contract88
- Token50
- Social / X66
- Website64
Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best
- Yes
- 0%
- Renounced
- 100% / 0%
- MC at check
- $349.6K
- MC now
- no live price
- Since check
- —
- Liquidity
- $57.1K
Live chart
The chart updates live; “MC at check” above is the market cap when this check ran.
Key findings
- HighDeployer sold 95% of their tokens
- MediumUnidentified program account holds 25% of supply
- MediumTop 10 wallets hold about 53% of supply
- Mediumpump.fun multisig can upgrade programs and pause PumpSwap trading
- GoodMint authority revoked: supply is fixed
What would change the verdict
- Raises safety:The 25% Token-2022 program account is shown to be a time-locked vesting/lock → token score up
- Lowers safety:Deployer wallet sells its remaining 1.33% or moves more supply to exchanges → down
- Lowers safety:pump.fun admin multisig disables PumpSwap sells or raises pool fees → down
Findings
15 findingsRisks (6)
HighDeployer sold 95% of their tokensinsidersDeterministic
The deployer wallet has sold 95% of the tokens it received — the creator is cashing out.
Evidence
- on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 95.0079
- on-chainDeployer bought/received 26.5763% of supply at launch (slot 427421761–427421762)
- on-chainDeployer 9vSzxkCJiEuGwYnJGo17XsofAANM5GMzBg5rJquejs7o holds 1.3267% now
- on-chainoffchain description
Show source
Fair launch, no presale.
Confirmed by: facts, claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7
MediumUnidentified program account holds 25% of supplyholdersAI
The top holder, 3intixS4SrDdEs8F19gb8r4o2qiobFTU1sfwuVvENDKo, is labelled only as a PDA of SPL Token-2022 and holds 25.0004%. The facts do not identify which program controls it: a lock, a vesting contract, or something else. Its unlock or withdraw rules are unknown. If whoever controls it can release the tokens freely, that is a large potential sell. The top 10 holders together control 52.89%.
Evidence
- on-chaintopHolders[0] 3intixS4SrDdEs8F19gb8r4o2qiobFTU1sfwuVvENDKo pct 25.0004 label "PDA of SPL Token-2022"
- on-chaintop10Pct = 52.8855
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
MediumTop 10 wallets hold about 53% of supplyholdersAI
On-chain basics show 399 holders and the top 10 together hold 52.8855% of $LSM. A small set of wallets can move the price hard if they sell. Who those wallets are (pool, team, or outsiders) is not in the material, so this is concentration, not proof of a hidden team stack.
Evidence
- on-chainholdersCount=399; top10Pct=52.8855
Show source
holdersCount: 399, top10Pct: 52.8855
Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol
Mediumpump.fun multisig can upgrade programs and pause PumpSwap tradingproxy-upgradeAI
This is platform-level risk, not control by the token creator. The pump.fun launchpad and PumpSwap AMM programs are upgradeable by a Squads v4 multisig, and their builds are not OtterSec-verified. The PumpSwap admin can call disable(disable_buy, disable_sell, …) and change fee settings for all pools. Holders rely on pump.fun not abusing these powers.
Evidence
- on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
- on-chainix disable(disable_create_pool: bool, disable_deposit: bool, disable_withdraw: bool, disable_buy: bool, disable_sell: bool) signers=[admin]
- on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
MediumMarketing says Tempo/EVM payments are live; docs say they are notclaims-mismatchAI
The homepage and recent posts tell merchants and agent users they can already get paid on Tempo, and posts also say Pay Core takes USDC on Ethereum, Arbitrum and Base. The project's own network docs say nothing in Elisym pays on Tempo end to end yet: the CLI, MCP server and web app are Solana-only, Tempo-priced cards are hidden or have a disabled Buy button. The same docs say Ethereum, Arbitrum and Base are not offered by checkout while the protocol fee is above 0. Someone buying $LSM because multi-chain payments are already live is relying on marketing that the docs contradict. This does not by itself let anyone drain the token.
Evidence
Show source
Paid straight to your wallet on Solana and Tempo - no platform in the middle.Show source
Payments go directly to the agent's wallet on Solana or Tempo.Show source
Multi-chain: Solana, Base, Ethereum, Arbitrum, TempoShow source
Pay Core now takes USDC on Ethereum, Arbitrum and BaseShow source
Nothing in elisym pays on Tempo end to end yet - the CLI, the MCP server and the web app are Solana-only, and a capability card priced on Tempo is hidden by the MCP and shown with a disabled Buy button in the web app.Show source
while the protocol fee is above 0 it does not offer them.
Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
LowShared-funder wallets and fresh wallets among top holdersholdersAI
Two top holders were funded by the same wallet, 2bRH3EXXX17Zh5bhAr1nCZPCSHKyb3Jcey3GB5zntLBr, and together hold 4.007%. Fresh wallets hold 17.19% of supply, based on 7 of 15 wallets checked. A shared funder is a signal, not proof of one owner.
Evidence
- on-chainclusters: funder 2bRH3EXXX17Zh5bhAr1nCZPCSHKyb3Jcey3GB5zntLBr wallets C56y9pXPG6B3LKbWnspdcShLU4jd65roubUCmdkkz68w, HzhzdUi7r6yKjtUznxedfbJaGSFnuQoyKWPtNHEKnJmw pctSupplyHeldNow 4.007
- on-chainfreshWalletsPct = 17.1921
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
Positive signals (7)
PositiveMint authority revoked: supply is fixedmintAI
No one can create new LSM tokens. The supply is permanently fixed at about 999.98 million, so holders cannot be diluted by new printing.
Evidence
- on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
- on-chainsupply = 999981403439475 (999,981,403.439475)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveFreeze authority revoked: no wallet can be frozenblacklistAI
No account has the power to freeze a holder's token account. This rules out the usual freeze-based honeypot, where buyers are blocked from selling.
Evidence
- on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveNo risky Token-2022 extensions; metadata is immutableotherAI
The mint runs on Token-2022 but uses only the metadataPointer and tokenMetadata extensions. Both have no authority. There is no permanent delegate, transfer hook, transfer fee, default-frozen state or pause. The name, symbol and logo can never be changed, so a later rename or logo swap is impossible.
Evidence
- on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null — metadata at 86T4G3zJaBxQAuWAbfXggE5d5XEt4bns3Y41jgVLpump; pointer authority none
- on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null — "Elisym" (LSM); update authority none (immutable)
- on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveGraduated PumpSwap pool LP is 100% burnedliquidityAI
The bonding curve completed and liquidity moved to the canonical pump.fun migration pool on PumpSwap, which holds about $57,117. All LP tokens were burned, so no one, including the deployer, can withdraw the pool liquidity.
Evidence
- on-chain[pools] PumpSwap BY2FcuNS53NDUZCxCAHffXQPF9t1cv2MJaczQY6yMCaY: LP minted 4193388289438, LP mint supply now 0 → 100% burned
- on-chain[pools] PumpSwap pool BY2FcuNS53NDUZCxCAHffXQPF9t1cv2MJaczQY6yMCaY is the canonical pump.fun migration pool (created by pump.fun pool-authority PDA)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveSelling works in simulation with 0% token taxhoneypotAI
A Jupiter round trip of buying for 0.1 SOL and then selling lost only 2.14%, which is price impact plus normal LP and protocol fees. A simulated sell by an existing holder succeeded. Buy and sell tax measured 0%.
Evidence
- forksell quote: 27611448161 tokens → 0.097855983 SOL; round-trip loss 2.14% (price impact 2.34%, LP/protocol fees and Token-2022 fees included)
- forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 27611448161 raw tokens by existing holder Ab586ANWVX7V4VVxVWXBJNXtv1hSyrGdkEyQSXoHBrZu succeeds (read-only simulation, not signed/sent)
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveFounder publicly linked to project; Flux mentions integrationsocialAI
The X account @igor_peregudov (created 2016) describes itself as Founder of @elisymlabs. A third party, @degenApe22, also names that account as the builder. @RunOnFlux separately confirmed the Flux Gateway integration the team announced. This is a public name plus an outside confirmation, not a legal identity check.
Evidence
Show source
One of the biggest agentic infrastructure projects is @elisymlabs Built by @igor_peregudovShow source
The gateway is live: an agent shows up with an app name and a container image, pays in USDC on Solana, and gets back a verified public URL on Flux Cloud without needing an account.
Confirmed by: grok-4.7 · Disputed by: gpt-5.6-sol
PositiveSite states token has no utility yet and is not an investmentwebsiteAI
The token page does not pretend $LSM already has a required role in the protocol. It calls it a community token, says utility is on the roadmap, and tells people to verify the contract. The posted mint matches the mint under review.
Evidence
Show source
$LSM will take on roles within the elisym network as the protocol grows. Utility is on the roadmap.Show source
Always verify the contract address before buying. $LSM is a community token, not an investment offer.Show source
86T4G3zJaBxQAuWAbfXggE5d5XEt4bns3Y41jgVLpump- on-chaintarget=86T4G3zJaBxQAuWAbfXggE5d5XEt4bns3Y41jgVLpump
Show source
target 86T4G3zJaBxQAuWAbfXggE5d5XEt4bns3Y41jgVLpump, ownerRenounced true, deployerHistory []
Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
Notes (2)
InfoOnly launch sniper bought 1.5% and has fully exitedsnipersAI
One wallet bought 1.47% of supply within the first 25 slots, about 10 seconds. It now holds 0%, so it creates no further dump risk. No bundles were detected.
Evidence
- on-chainsnipers: wallets [Anubis512ho5t7S6LNSwoxUWdeQmX2kf3RvZ8ApHHF5w], pctSupplyBought 1.4722, pctSupplyHeldNow 0
- on-chainbundles = []
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
InfoNo other tokens by deployer in scanned historydeployer-historyAI
The creator's 400 most recent transactions contain no other mint creations. This history scan only reaches back to 2026-07-15, after this token launched.
Evidence
- on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 400 most recent successful txs back to 2026-07-15T20:42:43.000Z; found 0 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one
Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol
Score breakdown
Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.
Contract
weight 45%88Standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with all authorities revoked, no risky extensions and a working 0%-tax sell; only platform-level pump.fun admin powers remain.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Mint authority revoked, supply fixed
- Freeze authority revoked
- Immutable metadata, no risky Token-2022 extensions
- Buy and sell simulation pass at 0% tax
Lowered the score
- pump.fun/PumpSwap programs upgradeable by a Squads multisig, builds not verified
- PumpSwap admin can disable trading or change fees globally
Token
weight 30%50LP is burned and snipers are gone, but the deployer took over a quarter of supply at launch, has moved out 95% of it, and an unidentified program account holds 25%.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Graduated pool LP 100% burned (~$57K liquidity)
- Single launch sniper fully exited, no bundles
- No other tokens created by deployer in scanned history
Lowered the score
- Deployer received 26.6% at launch and has sold/moved 95%
- Unidentified program account holds 25% of supply
- Top 10 wallets hold about 53%
- Small funder cluster and fresh wallets hold part of supply
Social / X
weight 15%66Established X account with a publicly named founder and partner mentions, but posts oversell multi-chain payments that the docs say are not live.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Founder account publicly tied to the project
- Partner Flux referenced the integration
Lowered the score
- Posts claim Tempo and EVM payments are live, contradicted by own docs
Website
weight 10%64Real product site and docs since March 2026 that honestly label the token as utility-less, but homepage payment claims overstate what the docs confirm.
Why this score
Raised the score
- Site and docs online since March 2026
- Site says token has no utility yet and is not an investment
- Posted mint matches the token reviewed
Lowered the score
- Homepage claims Tempo payouts that docs say do not work end to end
- Metadata says 'fair launch' despite 26.6% dev allocation