Skip to content

Solana·Scanned 05 Nov 2026, 01:28 UTC

infomo $INFOMO

514ezc4Me9yDwnYQ8He6KLBytxiDi6QCoBqCotwZpump

Verdict

Caution

63/100 safety

Mint, freeze and metadata authorities revoked; sells work at 0% tax, but ~48% of supply was bundled at launch.

The token itself is clean: nobody can mint new tokens, freeze wallets or change its details, and selling works with no token tax. The main risk is the launch: coordinated wallet bundles bought about 48% of supply in the first seconds, and one 11-wallet group has already sold out. Linked wallets still hold sizeable shares and could dump on the still-thin pump.fun curve. The project, its site and its X account are only days old, and the team is anonymous.

Score breakdown

  • Contract
    90
  • Token
    32
  • Social / X
    50
  • Website
    55

Higher is safer · 0 = worst · 100 = best

Yes
0%
Renounced
0% / 0%
MC at check
$10.1K
MC now
no live price
Since check
—
Liquidity
—

Key findings

  • HighOne funder's 11 wallets bundled 15.3% of supply
  • HighAbout 48% of supply bought in coordinated bundles at launch
  • MediumFunder-linked wallet clusters sit among top holders
  • GoodMint and freeze authority revoked: fixed supply, no freezing

What would change the verdict

  • Lowers safety:Remaining launch-bundle and linked-cluster wallets (top holders with ~5-6% each) sell into the curve → down
  • Lowers safety:On-chain data links the bundle funders to the deployer wallet → down
  • Raises safety:Curve graduates to PumpSwap with LP burned and holder concentration falls → up
Post on XView on explorer ↗

Findings

14 findings

Risks (3)

  • HighOne funder's 11 wallets bundled 15.3% of supplysnipersDeterministic

    11 wallets funded by the same address dq5jwbjywdjeybxzuuyu36subud6l6wo3an1qc1brmsr bought 15.3% of the supply together (block 465497171). Spreading one buyer over many wallets hides how much a single entity controls.

    Evidence

    • on-chainbundles with commonFunder dq5jwbjywdjeybxzuuyu36subud6l6wo3an1qc1brmsr: 11 wallets, pctSupply 15.33

    Confirmed by: facts

  • HighAbout 48% of supply bought in coordinated bundles at launchsnipersAI

    Five launch bundles bought about 15.33%, 14.55%, 11.65%, 5.26% and 1.17% of supply. They all landed between slots 465497143 and 465497171; the token was created at slot 465497142. The 11.65% bundle landed in slot 465497143, the same slot range as the deployer's own 1% buy. The largest bundle of 11 wallets shares one funder, DQ5JWbJyWdJeyBxZuuyu36sUBud6L6wo3aN1QC1bRmsR. Wallet 3qvuM3U5UZPVagL1spxmgVgUvzT3h49gyJZyagxRtqKr appears in two different bundles. Coordinated early buyers holding a large share can sell into the curve together and crash the price. The data shows the DQ5J funder cluster now holds 0%, so it has already sold. For the other bundles, current holdings could not be fully verified.

    Evidence

    • on-chainbundle block 465497171 commonFunder DQ5JWbJyWdJeyBxZuuyu36sUBud6L6wo3aN1QC1bRmsR
      Show source
      pctSupply 15.3331
    • on-chainbundle block 465497146 (3 wallets)
      Show source
      pctSupply 14.5534
    • on-chainbundle block 465497143 (5 wallets)
      Show source
      pctSupply 11.6484
    • on-chainDeployer bought/received 1% of supply at launch (slot 465497142–465497143)
    • on-chaincluster funder DQ5JWbJyWdJeyBxZuuyu36sUBud6L6wo3aN1QC1bRmsR pctSupplyHeldNow 0

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • MediumFunder-linked wallet clusters sit among top holdersholdersAI

    Excluding the bonding curve, the top 10 wallets hold about 32% of supply. The two largest wallets hold about 6.02% and 6.00%. Several funder clusters link top holders: - DScDQ1zV… funds AmyhpdFR…, which holds 4.88% and also appeared in a launch bundle. - F7p3dFrj… funds two wallets that together hold 4.82%. - 5tzFkiKs… funds four wallets that together hold 3.74%. A few coordinated sellers could move the price sharply on a thin curve.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintop10Pct = 32.0219
    • on-chaincluster funder DScDQ1zV4qVMU8HQmfcJkjZhfo5QqCWdV7dbxkb2gU9C pctSupplyHeldNow 4.8812
    • on-chaincluster funder F7p3dFrjRTbtRp8FRF6qHLomXbKRBzpvBLjtQcfcgmNe pctSupplyHeldNow 4.8228
    • on-chaincluster funder 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9 pctSupplyHeldNow 3.7425

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: grok-4.7

Positive signals (6)

  • PositiveMint and freeze authority revoked: fixed supply, no freezingmintAI

    Nobody can create new INFOMO tokens, so supply stays fixed at about 999,998,329.76. Nobody can freeze a holder's token account to stop them from selling.

    Evidence

    • on-chainmintAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainfreezeAuthority = null (revoked)
    • on-chainsupply = 999998329756442 (999,998,329.756442)
      Show source
      fixed (mint authority revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveMetadata is immutable and no risky Token-2022 extensions existotherAI

    The mint uses Token-2022 with only two extensions, metadataPointer and tokenMetadata, and both have authority none. The name, symbol and links cannot be changed later. There is no permanent delegate that could take tokens from holders, no transfer hook that could block transfers, and no transfer fee.

    Evidence

    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension tokenMetadata risk=info authority=null
      Show source
      "infomo" (INFOMO); update authority none (immutable)
    • on-chaintoken-2022 extension metadataPointer risk=info authority=null
      Show source
      pointer authority none
    • on-chainAUTHORITY update = null (revoked)

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSell simulation succeeds with 0% buy and sell taxhoneypotAI

    The Jupiter round-trip quote through the pump.fun curve lost 2.80% in total, which is explained by price impact and the normal launchpad fees. A read-only sell simulation by an existing holder succeeded. Buy and sell tax are both 0%.

    Evidence

    • forksell quote: 932263834956 tokens → 0.097201795 SOL; round-trip loss 2.80%
    • forksimulateTransaction: SELL of 932263834956 raw tokens by existing holder 55fsiis7ozQBjuAhrM2PbUDNK8pmZaMiKyJsh4VLASxG succeeds

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveLiquidity locked in the pump.fun curve; creator cannot withdraw itliquidityAI

    The token has not graduated; the curve is about 65.73% complete with about 28.35 SOL in real reserves. The pump.fun program holds the liquidity, and LP tokens do not exist yet. The creator has no way to pull this liquidity.

    Evidence

    • on-chain[pools] pump.fun bonding curve 2wvwumjuxP6tzUuMoj1LSdws86hCvMVyXczbCB3LaSkB: liquidity is held by the curve program (creator cannot withdraw it); LP tokens do not exist until graduation
    • on-chainpump.fun curve 2wvwumjuxP6tzUuMoj1LSdws86hCvMVyXczbCB3LaSkB: complete=false, progress ≈ 65.73%

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveOfficial X account posts the matching token addresssocialAI

    The project account @useinfomo is the X account linked from infomo.app. In the launch post it published the mint address that matches the token under review, and it says the product is independent of fomo (the fomo.family trading app), not financial advice, and that wallet sign-in is a signature rather than a transaction.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • PositiveSite and X openly say the Ask feature is not live yetwebsiteAI

    Both the website and the project X account label the plain-language Ask feature as planned and not live, rather than claiming it already works. That is a transparency note, not a hidden product risk.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

Notes (5)

  • Lowpump.fun program is multisig-upgradeable with an unverified buildproxy-upgradeAI

    The launchpad program that holds the curve liquidity can be upgraded by a Squads v4 multisig. Its on-chain build is not verified by OtterSec. That multisig, together with the program's global authority, also controls fees, curve parameters and creator reassignment (set_params, admin_cto, set_creator). This is platform-level trust in pump.fun shared by every pump.fun token. The INFOMO creator does not control it.

    Evidence

    • on-chainupgrade authority 7gZufwwAo17y5kg8FMyJy2phgpvv9RSdzWtdXiWHjFr8: multisig (Squads v4 multisig vault (PDA))
    • on-chainOtterSec: On chain program not verified
    • on-chainix set_params(... fee_basis_points: u64, withdraw_authority: pubkey ...) signers=[authority] risk=high

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • LowWebsite and X account created two days before launchwebsiteAI

    The infomo.app domain was created on 2026-11-03, two days before the token launched on 2026-11-05. It has no Wayback history. A brand-new domain gives no track record for the project's product claims.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoDeployer holds 1% and has not soldinsidersAI

    The creator wallet bought 1% at launch and still holds it. Its recent history shows no other token launches. This is a small dev stake, but the history check covered only 5 transactions.

    Evidence

    • on-chainDeployer 4j4Kgv1YR1EWJRsyvxFNLU3TNE1juy7WmHwWCTM334Cf holds 1% now
    • on-chaindeployerSoldPct = 0
    • on-chaindeployerHistory: scanned the creator's 5 most recent successful txs (full history); found 1 mint(s) created, 0 other than this one

    Confirmed by: claude-opus-5.5, grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol

  • InfoUnverified replies accuse the launch of a farm and a nukesocialAI

    Two replies accused the launch of a farm and a nuke. The project account denied any link and told people to check wallets. No post in the search results, and no deployer history in the given facts, shows a prior rug or proves those replies. Treat them as unverified comments, not as confirmed theft.

    Evidence

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, gpt-5.6-sol · Disputed by: claude-opus-5.5

  • InfoTeam behind infomo is not publicly identifiedclaims-mismatchAI

    The site and X account do not name a person behind infomo and do not claim a verified FOMO developer profile. Identity is unverifiable from public posts. That is a trust gap, not evidence that the token mint can be abused. Given facts say owner is null and ownerRenounced is true, and deployer history is empty.

    Evidence

    • Show source
      infomo is an independent project. It is not made, endorsed or run by FOMO Labs or fomo.family.
    • on-chainowner=null; ownerRenounced=true; deployerHistory=[]
      Show source
      owner=null; ownerRenounced=true; deployerHistory=[]

    Confirmed by: grok-4.7, claude-opus-5.5

Score breakdown

Higher is safer. The overall is the weighted average of the assessed parts, then capped by hard facts.

  • Contract

    weight 45%
    90

    A standard pump.fun Token-2022 mint with every authority revoked, no risky extensions and a working 0% tax sell; the only residual trust is in pump.fun's upgradeable platform program.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Mint and freeze authority revoked
    • Immutable metadata, only metadata extensions
    • Sell simulation passes with 0% tax
    • Liquidity held by the bonding curve, not the creator

    Lowered the score

    • pump.fun program is upgradeable by a Squads multisig with an unverified build
  • Token

    weight 30%
    32

    About 48% of supply went to coordinated same-block bundles right after launch, one 11-wallet bundle has already exited, and linked clusters still sit among the top holders.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Deployer holds only 1% and has not sold
    • No prior token launches from the deployer in its scanned history
    • Curve liquidity cannot be pulled by the creator

    Lowered the score

    • One funder's 11 wallets bundled 15.3% and now hold 0%
    • Five launch bundles took about 48% of supply
    • Funder-linked clusters among top holders
    • Top 10 wallets hold about 32% outside the curve
  • Social / X

    weight 15%
    50

    The brand-new X account posts the correct mint and consistent disclaimers, but it has no history, the team is anonymous and there are unverified farm/nuke accusations.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Official X account posts the matching mint
    • Honest messaging that the Ask feature is not live

    Lowered the score

    • X account created two days before launch with 33 followers
    • Team not identified
    • Unverified replies alleging a farm and a nuke
  • Website

    weight 10%
    55

    The site is functional and consistent with the X account, but the domain is two days old and its product and holder-tier claims cannot be verified.

    Why this score

    Raised the score

    • Site and X agree on product status and disclaimers
    • Clear statement of independence from FOMO Labs

    Lowered the score

    • Domain registered two days before launch, no archive history
    • Holder-tier and API credit claims unverifiable